首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Superior Effects of High-Intensity Interval vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Endothelial Function and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Superior Effects of High-Intensity Interval vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Endothelial Function and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:高强度间歇训练与中等强度连续训练对1型糖尿病患者内皮功能和心肺适应性的优异效果:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to compare the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with moderate-intensity continuous training (MCT) on endothelial function, oxidative stress and clinical fitness in patients with type 1 diabetes. Thirty-six type 1 diabetic patients (mean age 23.5 ± 6 years) were randomized into 3 groups: HIIT, MCT, and a non-exercising group (CON). Exercise was performed in a stationary cycle ergometers during 40 min, 3 times/week, for 8 weeks at 50–85% maximal heart rate (HRmax) in HIIT and 50% HRmax in MCT. Endothelial function was measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) [endothelium-dependent vasodilation (EDVD)], and smooth-muscle function by nitroglycerin-mediated dilation [endothelium-independent vasodilation (EIVD)]. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) and oxidative stress markers were determined before and after training. Endothelial dysfunction was defined as an increase < 8% in vascular diameter after cuff release. The trial is registered at , identifier: . Twenty-seven patients completed the 8-week protocol, 9 in each group (3 random dropouts per group). Mean baseline EDVD was similar in all groups. After training, mean absolute EDVD response improved from baseline in HIIT: + 5.5 ± 5.4%, (P = 0.0059), but remained unchanged in MCT: 0.2 ± 4.1% (P = 0.8593) and in CON: −2.6 ± 6.4% (P = 0.2635). EDVD increase was greater in HIIT vs. MCT (P = 0.0074) and CON (P = 0.0042) (ANOVA with Bonferroni). Baseline VO2peak was similar in all groups (P = 0.96). VO2peak increased 17.6% from baseline after HIIT (P = 0.0001), but only 3% after MCT (P = 0.055); no change was detected in CON (P = 0.63). EIVD was unchanged in all groups (P = 0.18). Glycemic control was similar in all groups. In patients with type 1 diabetes without microvascular complications, 8-week HIIT produced greater improvement in endothelial function and physical fitness than MCT at a similar glycemic control.
机译:这项研究旨在比较高强度间歇训练(HIIT)与中强度连续训练(MCT)对1型糖尿病患者内皮功能,氧化应激和临床适应性的影响。将36例1型糖尿病患者(平均年龄23.5±6岁)随机分为3组:HIIT,MCT和非运动组(CON)。运动以固定周期测力计进行,为期40分钟,每周3次,连续8周,HIIT的最大心率(HRmax)为50–85%,MCT的最大心率为50%。内皮功能通过血流介导的扩张(FMD)[内皮依赖性血管舒张(EDVD)]进行测量,平滑肌功能通过硝酸甘油介导的扩张[内皮依赖性血管舒张(EIVD)]进行测量。在训练前后确定峰值耗氧量(VO2peak)和氧化应激指标。内皮功能障碍定义为袖带释放后血管直径增加<8%。试用版注册在,标识符:。 27名患者完成了为期8周的治疗方案,每组9名(每组3名随机辍学)。所有组的平均基线EDVD相似。训练后,HIIT的平均绝对EDVD反应率较基线水平提高了:+ 5.5±5.4%(P = 0.0059),而在MCT中则保持不变:0.2±4.1%(P = 0.8593)和CON:−2.6±6.4%( P = 0.2635)。 HIIT与MCT(P = 0.0074)和CON(P = 0.0042)(带有Bonferroni的ANOVA)相比,EDVD的增加更大。所有组的基线VO2peak相似(P = 0.96)。 HIIT后VO2peak比基线增加17.6%(P = 0.0001),而MCT后VO2peak仅增加3%(P = 0.055); CON中未检测到变化(P = 0.63)。所有组的EIVD均无变化(P = 0.18)。所有组的血糖控制均相似。在没有微血管并发症的1型糖尿病患者中,在相似的血糖控制下,8周HIIT可使内皮功能和身体素质得到更大改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号