首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Physiology >Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on endothelial function of arteries in type-2 diabetes patients; a randomized double blind clinical trial
【24h】

Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on endothelial function of arteries in type-2 diabetes patients; a randomized double blind clinical trial

机译:高强度间歇训练与中强度连续训练对2型糖尿病患者血管内皮功能的有效性;一项随机双盲临床试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Obesity, characterized with hypertrophy and hyperplasia of adipocytes, is a pro- Background: Considering the importance of exercise intensity in training, the present study aimed to compare the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on endothelial function of arteries in type-2 diabetes patients. Methods: In the present randomized double blind parallel clinical trial, 36 T2D patients were allocated to 3 groups of control (without regular training), MICT, and HIIT. Anthropometric indices, Biochemical evaluation, peak oxygen consumption (VO 2peak ), resting NOx, and resting ET-1, and insulin resistance index was calculated using homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR) method were measured and compared. Results: Both MICT and HIIT reduced haemoglobin A1c [F (2, 33) = 80.2; p < 0.0001], insulin [F (2, 33) = 57.7; p < 0.0001], and HOMA-IR [F (2, 33) = 99.1; p < 0.0001]. However, the effect of HIIT (p = 0.004) was more than MICT (p < 0.001) in reducing the 3 mentioned factors. Both MICT (p < 0.0001) and HIIT (p = 0.0002) led to a significant increase in NOx [F (2, 33) = 57.7; p < 0.0001] in diabetic patients. This increase was significantly higher in HIIT group group (p < 0.0001). In addition, HIIT intervention caused a significant increase in VO 2peak compared to control group (p < 0.0001) and MICT group (p < 0.0001) [F (2, 33) = 59.9; p < 0.0001]. ET-1 level was also reduced after training intervention in both MICT (p = 0.02) and HIIT (p = 0.02) groups compared to control group [F (2, 33) = 5.5; p = 0.009]. Conclusion: HIIT can lead to more improvements in endothelial function and controlling diabetes and lipid profile compared to MICT, by causing more increase in aerobic fitness, more decrease in insulin resistance, and more increase in NOx bioactivity.
机译:背景:以脂肪细胞肥大和增生为特征的肥胖症是一项有利的背景。 (MICT)对2型糖尿病患者动脉内皮功能的影响。方法:在本随机双盲平行临床试验中,将36例T2D患者分为3组对照组(未经常规培训),MICT和HIIT。人体模型指数,生化评估,峰值耗氧量(VO 2peak),NOx静息和ET-1静息,以及使用稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)方法计算胰岛素抵抗指数,并进行比较。结果:MICT和HIIT均降低了血红蛋白A1c [F(2,33)= 80.2; p <0.0001],胰岛素[F(2,33)= 57.7; p <0.0001],而HOMA-IR [F(2,33)= 99.1; p <0.0001]。但是,HIIT(p = 0.004)在减少上述3个因素方面的效果比MICT(p <0.001)大。 MICT(p <0.0001)和HIIT(p = 0.0002)均导致NOx显着增加[F(2,33)= 57.7; p <0.0001]在糖尿病患者中。 HIIT组的这种增加明显更高(p <0.0001)。此外,与对照组(p <0.0001)和MICT组(p <0.0001)相比,HIIT干预导致VO 2peak显着增加[F(2,33)= 59.9; p <0.0001]。与对照组相比,在MICT(p = 0.02)和HIIT(p = 0.02)组进行训练干预后,ET-1水平也降低了[F(2,33)= 5.5; p = 0.009]。结论:与MICT相比,HIIT可以导致更多的有氧健身活动,更多的胰岛素抵抗降低以及更多的NOx生物活性增加,从而比MICT改善内皮功能,控制糖尿病和血脂状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号