首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Single fraction radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastasis: A dosimetric comparison of multiple delivery platforms
【2h】

Single fraction radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastasis: A dosimetric comparison of multiple delivery platforms

机译:脊柱转移的单次放射外科/立体定向放射治疗(SBRT):多个递送平台的剂量学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There are numerous commercial radiotherapy systems capable of delivering single fraction spine radiosurgery/SBRT. We aim to compare the capabilities of several of these systems to deliver this treatment when following standardized criteria from a national protocol. Four distinct target lesions representing various case presentations of spine metastases were contoured in both the thoracic and lumbar spine of an anthropomorphic SBRT phantom. Single fraction radiosurgery/SBRT plans were designed for each target with each of our treatment platforms. Plans were prescribed to 16 Gy in one fraction to cover 90% of the target volume using normal tissue and target constraints from RTOG 0631. We analyzed these plans with priority on the dose to 10% of the partial spinal cord and dose to 0.03 cc of the spinal cord. Each system was able to maintain 90% target coverage while meeting all the constraints of RTOG 0631. On average, CyberKnife was able to achieve the lowest spinal cord doses overall and also generated the sharpest dose falloff as indicated by the Paddick gradient index. Treatment times varied widely depending on the modality utilized. On average, treatment can be delivered faster with Flattening Filter Free RapidArc and Tomotherapy, compared to Vero and Cyberknife. While all systems analyzed were able to meet the dose constraints of RTOG 0631, unique characteristics of individual treatment modalities may guide modality selection. Specifically, certain modalities performed better than the others for specific target shapes and locations, and delivery time varied significantly among the different modalities. These findings could provide guidance in determining which of the available modalities would be preferable for the treatment of spine metastases based on individualized treatment goals.
机译:有许多商业放射治疗系统能够进行单级脊柱放射外科手术/ SBRT。我们的目标是按照国家标准的标准化标准,比较其中几种系统提供这种治疗的能力。在拟人化SBRT体模的胸椎和腰椎中,描绘了代表脊柱转移的各种病例表现的四个不同的目标病变。我们的每个治疗平台均针对每个目标设计了单部分放射外科手术/ SBRT计划。使用正常组织和来自RTOG 0631的目标限制,计划被规定为16 Gy的一小部分,以覆盖90%的目标体积。我们优先考虑部分脊髓的10%剂量和0.03 cc的剂量对这些计划进行分析。脊髓。每个系统都能够维持90%的目标覆盖率,同时满足RTOG 0631的所有限制。平均而言,Cyber​​Knife能够实现总体上最低的脊髓剂量,并且还产生了如Paddick梯度指数所示的最大剂量下降。根据使用的方式,治疗时间差异很大。平均而言,与Vero和Cyber​​knife相比,使用Flattening Free Free RapidArc和Tomotherapy可以更快地提供治疗。尽管分析的所有系统均能够满足RTOG 0631的剂量限制,但个别治疗方式的独特特征可能会指导方式选择。具体而言,对于特定的目标形状和位置,某些模式的性能要优于其他模式,并且交付时间在不同模式之间差异很大。这些发现可为根据个体化治疗目标确定哪种可用方式对脊柱转移瘤的治疗提供指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号