首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EMBO Molecular Medicine >Defamation lawsuits: academic sword or shield?
【2h】

Defamation lawsuits: academic sword or shield?

机译:诽谤诉讼:学术之剑还是盾牌?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Scientists and academics are used to defending their theories, methods, and results in the classroom, at conferences, and in peer‐reviewed publications. But Pieter Cohen, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, learned that he had to defend his research in a defamation suit while reading a supplement industry trade publication (Robins, ). Cohen is known as a “dogged detective” for scrutinizing dietary supplements and for advocating for their stricter oversight by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
机译:科学家和学者习惯在教室,会议和经过同行评审的出版物中捍卫其理论,方法和结果。但是哈佛医学院的助理教授彼得·科恩(Pieter Cohen)得知,他在阅读补充性行业贸易出版物(Robins,)时必须穿着一件诽谤诉讼为自己的研究辩护。科恩因仔细检查膳食补充剂并倡导其受到美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的严格监督而被称为“顽强的侦探”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号