首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Neurophysiology >Patterns of hypermetria and terminal cocontraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers
【2h】

Patterns of hypermetria and terminal cocontraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers

机译:点对点运动过程中的子宫肥大和终末收缩的模式证明了轨迹和姿势控制器的独立作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We examined elbow muscle activities and movement kinematics to determine how subjects combine elementary control actions in performing movements with one and two trajectory segments. In reaching, subjects made a rapid elbow flexion to a visual target before stabilizing the limb with either a low or a higher level of elbow flexor/extensor coactivity (CoA), which was cued by target diameter. Cursor diameter provided real-time biofeedback of actual muscle CoA. In reversing, the limb was to reverse direction within the target and return to the origin with minimal CoA. We previously reported that subjects overshoot the goal when attempting a reversal after first having learned to reach accurately to the same target. Here we test the hypothesis that this hypermetria results because reversals co-opt the initial feedforward control action from the preceding trained reach, thereby failing to account for task-dependent changes in limb impedance induced by differences in flexor/extensor coactivity as the target is acquired (higher in reaching than reversing). Instructed increases in elbow CoA began mid-reach, thus increasing elbow impedance and reducing transient oscillations present in low CoA movments. Flexor EMG alone increased at movement onset. Test reversals incorporated the initial agonist activity of previous reaches but not the increased coactivity at the target, thus leading to overshoot. Moreover, we observed elevated coactivity in reversals upon returning to the origin even though coactivity in reaching was centered at the goal target. These findings refute the idea that the brain necessarily invokes distinct unitary control actions for reaches and reversals made to the same target. Instead, reaches and reversals share a common control action that initiates trajectories toward their target and another later control action that terminates movement and stabilizes the limb about its final resting posture, which differs in the two tasks.
机译:我们检查了肘部肌肉活动和运动运动学,以确定受试者如何在执行具有一个和两个轨迹段的运动时结合基本控制动作。在达到目标时,受试者先将肘部快速屈曲至视觉目标,然后以较低或较高水平的肘部屈肌/伸肌协作性(CoA)稳定肢体,这取决于目标直径。光标直径提供了实际肌肉CoA的实时生物反馈。在反转时,肢体将在目标内反转方向,并以最小的CoA返回原点。我们先前曾报道过,受试者在首次学会准确地达到同一目标后尝试进行逆转时,会超出目标。在这里,我们测试了以下假设:由于逆转选择了先前训练范围内的初始前馈控制动作,因此未能解释该超子宫症的发生,从而无法解释由于获得目标而导致的与屈肌/伸肌共同活动性差异引起的肢体阻抗的任务依赖性变化(触及率高于倒退)。肘部CoA的指示性增加从中伸肌开始,因此增加了肘部阻抗并减少了低CoA运动中出现的瞬态振荡。运动开始时仅屈肌肌电增加。测试逆转结合了先前作用的初始激动剂活性,但没有结合靶标上增加的协同活性,因此导致过冲。此外,我们观察到返回原点时逆向的协作性提高,即使到达时的协作性以目标目标为中心。这些发现驳斥了大脑必须针对到达和反转相同目标而调用独特的统一控制动作的想法。取而代之的是,到达和逆转共享一个共同的控制动作,该动作向其目标启动轨迹;另一个稍后的控制动作,该动作终止运动并使肢体稳定在其最终静止姿势附近,这在两个任务中有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号