首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Immunology >Confounding roles for type I interferons during bacterial and viral pathogenesis
【2h】

Confounding roles for type I interferons during bacterial and viral pathogenesis

机译:I型干扰素在细菌和病毒发病机理中的混杂作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although type I interferons (IFN-I) were initially defined as potent antiviral agents, they can also cause decreased host resistance to some bacterial and viral infections. The many antiviral functions of the IFN-I include direct suppression of viral replication and activation of the immune response against viruses. In addition to their antiviral effects, IFN-I are also protective against several extracellular bacterial infections, in part, by promoting the induction of TNF-α and nitric oxide. In contrast, there is a negative effect of IFN-I on host resistance during chronic infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and acute infections with intracellular bacteria. In the case of LCMV, chronic IFN-I signaling induces adaptive immune system suppression. Blockade of IFN-I signaling removes the suppression and allows CD4 T-cell- and IFN-γ-mediated resolution of the infection. During acute intracellular bacterial infection, IFN-I suppress innate immunity by at least two defined mechanisms. During Francisella infection, IFN-I prevent IL-17 upregulation on γδ T cells and neutrophil recruitment. Following Listeria infection, IFN-I promote the cell death of macrophages and lymphocytes, which leads to innate immune suppression. These divergent findings for the role of IFN-I on pathogen control emphasize the complexity of the interferons system and force more mechanistic evaluation of its role in pathogenesis. This review evaluates IFN-I during infection with an emphasis on work carried out IFN-I-receptor-deficient mice.
机译:尽管最初将I型干扰素(IFN-I)定义为有效的抗病毒剂,但它们也可能导致宿主对某些细菌和病毒感染的抵抗力下降。 IFN-1的许多抗病毒功能包括直接抑制病毒复制和激活针对病毒的免疫应答。除了它们的抗病毒作用外,IFN-1还通过促进TNF-α和一氧化氮的诱导而对几种细胞外细菌感染具有保护作用。相反,IFN-1对淋巴细胞性脉络膜脑膜炎病毒(LCMV)的慢性感染和细胞内细菌的急性感染过程中对宿主抗性具有负面作用。在LCMV的情况下,慢性IFN-1信号传导诱导适应性免疫系统抑制。干扰素I信号传导的阻滞消除了抑制作用,并使CD4 T细胞和干扰素γ介导的感染消退。在急性细胞内细菌感染期间,IFN-I通过至少两种确定的机制抑制先天免疫。在弗朗西斯菌感染期间,IFN-I阻止了γδT细胞的IL-17上调和中性粒细胞募集。李斯特菌感染后,IFN-1促进巨噬细胞和淋巴细胞的细胞死亡,从而导致先天免疫抑制。这些关于IFN-I在病原体控制中作用的不同发现强调了干扰素系统的复杂性,并要求对其机理在致病机理中进行更多的机理评估。这篇综述评估了感染期间的IFN-I,重点是对IFN-I受体缺陷型小鼠的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号