首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition >No difference in ad libitum energy intake in healthy men and women consuming beverages sweetened with fructose glucose or high-fructose corn syrup: a randomized trial
【2h】

No difference in ad libitum energy intake in healthy men and women consuming beverages sweetened with fructose glucose or high-fructose corn syrup: a randomized trial

机译:食用果糖葡萄糖或高果糖玉米糖浆加糖的健康男性和女性的随意摄入能量无差异:一项随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Increased energy intake is consistently observed in individuals consuming sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), likely mainly because of an inadequate satiety response to liquid calories. However, SSBs have a high content of fructose, the consumption of which acutely fails to trigger responses in key signals involved in energy homeostasis. It is unclear whether the fructose content of SSBs contributes to the increased energy intake in individuals drinking SSBs.>Objective: We investigated whether the relative amounts of fructose and glucose in SSBs modifies ad libitum energy intake over 8 d in healthy adults without fructose malabsorption.>Design: We conducted 2 randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover studies to compare the effects of consuming 4 servings/d of a fructose-, glucose-, or aspartame-sweetened beverage (study A; n = 9) or a fructose-, glucose-, or high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS)–sweetened beverage (study B; n = 24) for 8 d on overall energy intake. SSBs were provided at 25% of estimated energy requirement, or an equivalent volume of the aspartame-sweetened beverage, and consumption was mandatory. All solid foods were provided at 125% of estimated energy requirements and were consumed ad libitum.>Results: In study A, ad libitum energy intake was 120% ± 10%, 117% ± 12%, and 102% ± 15% of estimated energy requirements when subjects consumed the fructose-, glucose-, and aspartame-sweetened beverages. Energy intake was significantly higher in the fructose and glucose phases than in the aspartame phase (P < 0.003 for each), with no difference between the fructose and glucose phases (P = 0.462). In study B, total energy intake during the fructose, HFCS, and glucose phases was 116% ± 14%, 116% ± 16%, and 116% ± 16% of the subject’s estimated total energy requirements (P = 0.880).>Conclusions: In healthy adults, total 8-d ad libitum energy intake was increased in individuals consuming SSBs compared with aspartame-sweetened beverages. The energy overconsumption observed in individuals consuming SSBs occurred independently of the relative amounts of fructose and glucose in the beverages. These trials were registered at as and .
机译:>背景:在食用含糖饮料(SSB)的个人中,始终可以观察到能量摄入增加,这可能主要是由于对液体卡路里的饱腹感反应不足。但是,SSB的果糖含量很高,其消耗量严重无法触发涉及能量稳态的关键信号的响应。尚不清楚SSBs中的果糖含量是否有助于饮用SSBs的人增加能量摄入。>目的:我们研究了SSBs中果糖和葡萄糖的相对含量是否在8 d内改变了随意摄入的能量。健康的成年人,没有果糖吸收不良。>设计:我们进行了2项随机,对照,双盲交叉研究,比较了每天摄入4份果糖,葡萄糖或阿斯巴甜加糖饮料的效果(研究A; n = 9)或果糖,葡萄糖或高果糖玉米糖浆(HFCS)加糖的饮料(研究B; n = 24),总能量摄入为8天。提供的SSB仅为估计能量需求的25%,或等量的阿斯巴甜加糖饮料,并且必须消耗。所有固体食物均以估计的能量需求的125%提供,并且可以随意食用。>结果:在研究A中,随意摄入的能量为120%±10%,117%±12%和102当受试者饮用果糖,葡萄糖和阿斯巴甜加糖饮料时,估计能量需求的%±15%。果糖和葡萄糖相的能量摄入显着高于阿斯巴甜相(每个P <0.003),而果糖和葡萄糖相之间无差异(P = 0.462)。在研究B中,果糖,HFCS和葡萄糖阶段的总能量摄入量为受试者估计的总能量需求量的116%±14%,116%±16%和116%±16%(P = 0.880)。 >结论:在健康的成年人中,与服用阿斯巴甜的饮料相比,服用SSB的个体的8天自由采食总量增加了。在食用SSB的个体中观察到的能量过度消耗与饮料中果糖和葡萄糖的相对量无关。这些试验分别在和注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号