首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Cognitive Psychology >The Equiprobability Bias from a Mathematical and PsychologicalPerspective
【2h】

The Equiprobability Bias from a Mathematical and PsychologicalPerspective

机译:数学和心理学上的等概率偏差透视

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The equiprobability bias (EB) is a tendency to believe that every process in which randomness is involved corresponds to a fair distribution, with equal probabilities for any possible outcome. The EB is known to affect both children and adults, and to increase with probability education. Because it results in probability errors resistant to pedagogical interventions, it has been described as a deep misconception about randomness: the erroneous belief that randomness implies uniformity. In the present paper, we show that the EB is actually not the result of a conceptual error about the definition of randomness. On the contrary, the mathematical theory of randomness does imply uniformity. However, the EB is still a bias, because people tend to assume uniformity even in the case of events that are not random. The pervasiveness of the EB reveals a paradox: The combination of random processes is not necessarily random. The link between the EB and this paradox is discussed, and suggestions are made regarding educational design to overcome difficulties encountered by students as a consequence of the EB.
机译:等概率偏差(EB)倾向于认为涉及随机性的每个过程都对应一个公平的分布,并且对于任何可能的结果都具有相等的概率。众所周知,EB影响儿童和成人,并随着概率教育而增加。由于它会导致抵抗教学干预的概率错误,因此已被描述为对随机性的深刻误解:错误认为随机性意味着一致性。在本文中,我们表明EB实际上不是关于随机性定义的概念错误的结果。相反,随机性的数学理论确实暗示了均匀性。但是,EB仍然是一个偏见,因为即使在不是随机事件的情况下,人们也倾向于假定统一性。 EB的普遍性揭示了一个悖论:随机过程的组合不一定是随机的。讨论了EB与该悖论之间的联系,并就教育设计提出了一些建议,以克服学生因EB遇到的困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号