首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions
【2h】

Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions

机译:多项选择题的三种和四种选择类型中干扰因素的质量比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionThe number of distractors needed for high quality multiple choice questions (MCQs) will be determined by many factors. These include firstly whether English language is their mother tongue or a foreign language; secondly whether the instructors who construct the questions are experts or not; thirdly the time spent on constructing the options is also an important factor. It has been observed by Tarrant et al that more time is often spent on constructing questions than on tailoring sound, reliable, and valid distractors.
机译:简介高质量多项选择题(MCQ)所需的干扰因素的数量将由许多因素决定。这些首先包括英语是母语还是外语;其次,构成问题的讲师是否是专家;第三,花在构建期权上的时间也是一个重要因素。 Tarrant等人已经观察到,与构建健全,可靠和有效的干扰物相比,花更多的时间在构造问题上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号