首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Confidence and Information Access in Clinical Decision-Making: An Examination of the Cognitive Processes that affect the Information-seeking Behavior of Physicians
【2h】

Confidence and Information Access in Clinical Decision-Making: An Examination of the Cognitive Processes that affect the Information-seeking Behavior of Physicians

机译:临床决策中的信心和信息访问:对影响医师信息寻求行为的认知过程的检验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical decision-making involves the interplay between cognitive processes and physicians’ perceptions of confidence in the context of their information-seeking behavior. The objectives of the study are: to examine how these concepts interact, to determine whether physician confidence, defined in relation to information need, affects clinical decision-making, and if information access improves decision accuracy. We analyzed previously collected data about resident physicians’ perceptions of information need from a study comparing abstracts and full-text articles in clinical decision accuracy. We found that there is a significant relation between confidence and accuracy (φ=0.164, p<0.01). We also found various differences in the alignment of confidence and accuracy, demonstrating the concepts of underconfidence and overconfidence across years of clinical experience. Access to online literature also has a significant effect on accuracy (p<0.001). These results highlight possible CDSS strategies to reduce medical errors.
机译:临床决策涉及认知过程和医师在其寻求信息行为的背景下对自信心的认识之间的相互作用。该研究的目的是:检查这些概念如何相互作用,确定与信息需求有关的医师信心是否会影响临床决策,以及信息访问是否会提高决策准确性。我们通过比较摘要和全文文章在临床决策准确性方面的研究,分析了先前收集的有关住院医师对信息需求看法的数据。我们发现置信度和准确性之间存在显着关系(φ= 0.164,p <0.01)。我们还在置信度和准确性的一致性方面发现了各种差异,这表明了多年临床经验中的自信不足和自信过度的概念。访问在线文献也对准确性产生重大影响(p <0.001)。这些结果强调了减少医疗错误的可能的CDSS策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号