首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >A systematic review of the effectiveness of policies restricting access to pregabalin
【2h】

A systematic review of the effectiveness of policies restricting access to pregabalin

机译:对限制使用普瑞巴林的政策有效性的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundFormularies often employ restriction policies to reduce pharmacy costs. Pregabalin, an alpha-2-delta ligand, is approved for treatment of fibromyalgia (FM); neuropathic pain (NeP) due to postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), spinal cord injury; and as adjunct therapy for partial onset seizures. Pregabalin is endorsed as first-line therapy for these indications by several US and EU medical professional societies. However, restriction policies such as prior authorization (PA) and step therapy (ST) often favor less costly generic pain medications over pregabalin.
机译:背景技术部门通常采用限制政策以降低药房成本。普瑞巴林是一种α-2-δ配体,已被批准用于治疗纤维肌痛(FM);带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN),糖尿病周围神经病变(pDPN),脊髓损伤引起的神经性疼痛(NeP);作为部分发作的辅助疗法。普瑞巴林已被美国和欧盟的多个医学专业学会认可为这些适应症的一线治疗药物。但是,诸如普瑞巴林(pregabalin)之类的限制政策,如事前授权(PA)和阶梯疗法(ST),通常倾向于使用成本较低的通用止痛药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号