首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Nephrology >Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design methods and rationale
【2h】

Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design methods and rationale

机译:在家庭血液透析(BASIC-HHD)中成功实施护理的障碍:1。研究设计方法和原理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundTen years on from the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence’ technology appraisal guideline on haemodialysis in 2002; the clinical community is yet to rise to the challenge of providing home haemodialysis (HHD) to 10-15% of the dialysis cohort. The renal registry report, suggests underutilization of a treatment type that has had a lot of research interest and several publications worldwide on its apparent benefit for both physical and mental health of patients. An understanding of the drivers to introducing and sustaining the modality, from organizational, economic, clinical and patient perspectives is fundamental to realizing the full benefits of the therapy with the potential to provide evidence base for effective care models. Through the BASIC-HHD study, we seek to understand the clinical, patient and carer related psychosocial, economic and organisational determinants of successful uptake and maintenance of home haemodialysis and thereby, engage all major stakeholders in the process.
机译:背景从2002年开始,美国国家卫生与临床医学研究院(National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence)的血液透析技术评估指南就此展开;临床社区尚未面临向透析人群的10-15%提供家庭血液透析(HHD)的挑战。肾脏注册表报告表明,利用不足的一种治疗类型引起了很多研究兴趣,并且因其对患者身心健康的明显益处而在全球范围内发表了数篇出版物。从组织,经济,临床和患者的角度了解引入和维持这种治疗方式的驱动因素,对于实现治疗的全部益处以及为有效的护理模型提供依据的潜力至关重要。通过BASIC-HHD研究,我们力求了解成功摄取和维持家庭血液透析的临床,患者和护理人员相关的心理,经济和组织决定因素,从而使所有主要利益相关者参与其中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号