首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design, methods and rationale
【24h】

Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design, methods and rationale

机译:在家庭血液透析(BASIC-HHD)中成功实施护理的障碍:1。研究设计,方法和原理

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Ten years on from the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence’ technology appraisal guideline on haemodialysis in 2002; the clinical community is yet to rise to the challenge of providing home haemodialysis (HHD) to 10-15% of the dialysis cohort. The renal registry report, suggests underutilization of a treatment type that has had a lot of research interest and several publications worldwide on its apparent benefit for both physical and mental health of patients. An understanding of the drivers to introducing and sustaining the modality, from organizational, economic, clinical and patient perspectives is fundamental to realizing the full benefits of the therapy with the potential to provide evidence base for effective care models. Through the BASIC-HHD study, we seek to understand the clinical, patient and carer related psychosocial, economic and organisational determinants of successful uptake and maintenance of home haemodialysis and thereby, engage all major stakeholders in the process. Design and methods We have adopted an integrated mixed methodology (convergent, parallel design) for this study. The study arms include a. patient; b. organization; c. carer and d. economic evaluation. The three patient study cohorts (n = 500) include pre-dialysis patients (200), hospital haemodialysis (200) and home haemodialysis patients (100) from geographically distinct NHS sites, across the country and with variable prevalence of home haemodialysis. The pre-dialysis patients will also be prospectively followed up for a period of 12 months from study entry to understand their journey to renal replacement therapy and subsequently, before and after studies will be carried out for a select few who do commence dialysis in the study period. The process will entail quantitative methods and ethnographic interviews of all groups in the study. Data collection will involve clinical and biomarkers, psychosocial quantitative assessments and neuropsychometric tests in patients. Organizational attitudes and dialysis unit practices will be studied together with perceptions of healthcare providers on provision of home HD. Economic evaluation of home and hospital haemodialysis practices will also be undertaken and we will apply scenario ("what … if") analysis using system dynamics modeling to investigate the impact of different policy choices and financial models on dialysis technology adoption, care pathways and costs. Less attention is often given to the patient’s carers who provide informal support, often of a complex nature to patients afflicted by chronic ailments such as end stage kidney disease. Engaging the carers is fundamental to realizing the full benefits of a complex, home-based intervention and a qualitative study of the carers will be undertaken to elicit their fears, concerns and perception of home HD before and after patient’s commencement of the treatment. The data sets will be analysed independently and the findings will be mixed at the stage of interpretation to form a coherent message that will be informing practice in the future. Discussion The BASIC-HHD study is designed to assemble pivotal information on dialysis modality choice and uptake, investigating users, care-givers and care delivery processes and study their variation in a multi-layered analytical approach within a single health care system. The study results would define modality specific service and patient pathway redesign. Study Registration This study has been reviewed and approved by the Greater Manchester West Health Research Authority National Research Ethics Service (NRES) The study is on the NIHR (CLRN) portfolio.
机译:背景距2002年美国国家卫生与临床卓越研究所血液透析技术评估指南已十年;临床社区尚未面临向透析人群的10-15%提供家庭血液透析(HHD)的挑战。肾脏注册表报告表明,利用不足的一种治疗类型引起了很多研究兴趣,并且在全世界范围内因其对患者身心健康的明显益处而发表了数篇出版物。从组织,经济,临床和患者的角度了解引入和维持这种治疗方式的驱动因素,对于实现治疗的全部益处并为有效的护理模型提供证据基础是至关重要的。通过BASIC-HHD研究,我们力求了解成功摄取和维持家庭血液透析的临床,患者和护理人员相关的心理,经济和组织决定因素,从而使所有主要利益相关者参与其中。设计和方法我们为这项研究采用了集成的混合方法(收敛,并行设计)。研究部门包括。患者; b。组织; C。护老者和d。经济评估。这三个患者研究队列(n = 500)包括来自全国各地,在全国各地且家庭血液透析患病率不同的透析前患者(200),医院血液透析(200)和家庭血液透析患者(100)。透析前患者也将从入选前开始接受为期12个月的随访,以了解他们进行肾脏替代治疗的过程,随后,将在进行一些研究之前和之后进行选择透析的少数患者进行研究之前和之后。期。该过程将涉及研究中所有群体的定量方法和人种学访谈。数据收集将涉及患者的临床和生物标志物,社会心理定量评估和神经心理测验。将研究组织态度和透析部门的做法,以及医疗保健提供者对提供家庭高清的看法。还将进行家庭和医院血液透析实践的经济评估,我们将使用系统动力学模型进行情景分析(“假设……”),以调查不同政策选择和财务模型对透析技术采用,护理途径和成本的影响。提供非正式支持的患者护理人员通常受到的关注较少,非正式支持通常对患有慢性疾病(例如终末期肾脏疾病)的患者具有复杂的性质。与护理人员接触是实现复杂的,基于家庭的干预措施的全部益处的基础,并且将对护理人员进行定性研究,以在患者开始治疗之前和之后引起他们对家庭高清的恐惧,担忧和看法。数据集将被独立地分析,并且在解释阶段将发现的结果混合在一起,形成一个连贯的信息,这些信息将为将来的实践提供参考。讨论BASIC-HHD研究旨在收集有关透析方式选择和吸收的关键信息,调查用户,护理人员和护理提供过程,并在单个卫生保健系统中以多层分析方法研究其变化。研究结果将定义针对具体方式的服务和患者途径的重新设计。研究注册该研究已由大曼彻斯特西部健康研究局国家研究伦理服务(NRES)审查和批准。该研究涉及NIHR(CLRN)产品组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号