首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:重症监护随机临床试验中盲法对死亡率估计的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionEvidence exists that unblinded randomised clinical trials (RCTs) overestimate intervention effects compared with blinded RCTs. It has been suggested that this is less pronounced for objective (ie, not subject to interpretation) outcome measures, including mortality. This may not apply in the intensive care unit (ICU), as most deaths are preceded by decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments. Lack of blinding of physicians in RCTs of ICU interventions may potentially influence the decision towards a higher threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the investigational treatment and/or a lower threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the comparator (control). This may have important implications for patients, caregivers, researchers and society. Accordingly, we aim to assess whether lack of blinding affects mortality effect estimates in RCTs of ICU interventions.
机译:引言有证据表明,与双盲RCT相比,无盲随机临床试验(RCT)高估了干预效果。有人认为,这对于客观的(即无需解释的)结果指标(包括死亡率)不太明显。这可能不适用于重症监护病房(ICU),因为大多数死亡是在决定停药或撤药之前。在ICU干预的RCT中,医师对医生的不知情可能会影响决策,即接受研究治疗的患者应选择较高的中止治疗阈值和/或接受比较者(对照)的患者应中止较低的治疗阈值。这可能会对患者,护理人员,研究人员和社会产生重要影响。因此,我们旨在评估是否缺乏盲目性会影响ICU干预RCT中的死亡率影响评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号