首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Sensitivity and rapidity of blood culture bottles in the detection of cornea organ culture media contamination by bacteria and fungi
【2h】

Sensitivity and rapidity of blood culture bottles in the detection of cornea organ culture media contamination by bacteria and fungi

机译:血液培养瓶在检测细菌和真菌污染角膜器官培养基中的敏感性和快速性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aims: To test the bactericidal activity of standard organ culture medium, and to compare the sensitivity and rapidity of blood culture bottles with conventional microbiological methods for detection of bacteria and fungi inoculated in a standard cornea organ culture medium.>Methods: The bactericidal activity of contaminated standard organ culture medium containing 100 IU/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/ml amphotericin B was evaluated after 48 hours of incubation at 31°C with five inocula of 14 bacteria. Two yeasts (Candida spp) and one Aspergillus were also tested. Contaminated media were then inoculated in three blood bottles (aerobic, anaerobic, fungal) placed in a Bactec 9240 automat; three conventional microbiological broths were the control. Changes in colour of organ culture medium and growth on conventional broth were screened daily by visual inspection. The sensitivity and rapidity of detection of contamination were compared between the three methods: blood bottle, conventional, and visual.>Results: Organ culture medium eradicated five bacteria irrespective of the starting inoculums: Streptococcus pneumoniae, Branhamella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Propionibacterium acnes, and Haemophilus influenzae. For micro-organisms where the medium was ineffective or bactericidal only (methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Bacillus subtilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, Candida kruzei, Aspergillus fumigatus), the blood bottle, conventional, and visual methods detected microbial growth in 100%, 76.5%, and 70% of cases respectively. Mean detection time using blood bottles was 15.1 hours (SD 13.8, range 2–52). In cases of detection by the blood bottle method and the conventional method, the former was always faster: 95.5% against 65.2% detection within 24 hours (p=0.022) respectively.>Conclusions: Blood bottles detect more efficiently and more rapidly a wider range of bacteria and fungi than the conventional microbiological method and the visual inspection of organ culture media.
机译:>目的:测试标准器官培养基的杀菌活性,比较血液培养瓶与常规微生物学方法检测标准角膜器官培养基中接种的细菌和真菌的敏感性和快速性。 >方法:在31°C下孵育48小时后,评估含有100 IU / ml青霉素,0.1 mg / ml链霉素和0.25μg/ ml两性霉素B的受污染标准器官培养基的杀菌活性。 5种接种物,共14种细菌。还测试了两种酵母(Candida spp)和一种曲霉。然后将污染的培养基接种在置于Bactec 9240自动贩卖机中的三个血瓶(需氧,厌氧,真菌)中;三种常规的微生物肉汤作为对照。每天通过肉眼检查筛选器官培养基的颜色变化和常规肉汤的生长。比较了三种方法(血瓶,常规方法和视觉方法)检测污染的敏感性和快速性。>结果:器官培养基消除了五种细菌,而不论起始接种物是什么:肺炎链球菌,卡他氏杆菌,大肠杆菌,痤疮丙酸杆菌和流感嗜血杆菌。对于培养基无效或仅具有杀菌作用的微生物(耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌,对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌,表皮葡萄球菌,溶血性葡萄球菌,铜绿假单胞菌,鲍曼不动杆菌,卡氏杆菌,枯草芽孢杆菌,肠杆菌,枯草芽孢杆菌,烟曲霉,常规方法和目测方法分别在100%,76.5%和70%的病例中检测到了微生物的生长。使用血瓶的平均检测时间为15.1小时(SD 13.8,范围2–52)。在使用血瓶法和常规方法进行检测的情况下,前者总是更快:分别在24小时内检测率分别为95.5%和65.2%(p = 0.022)。>结论:血瓶检测效率更高与传统的微生物学方法和器官培养基的目测相比,细菌和真菌的范围更广。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号