首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brain Sciences >Computer versus Compensatory Calendar Training in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Functional Impact in a Pilot Study
【2h】

Computer versus Compensatory Calendar Training in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Functional Impact in a Pilot Study

机译:轻度认知障碍患者的计算机培训与薪酬日历培训:一项初步研究的功能影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This pilot study examined the functional impact of computerized versus compensatory calendar training in cognitive rehabilitation participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Fifty-seven participants with amnestic MCI completed randomly assigned calendar or computer training. A standard care control group was used for comparison. Measures of adherence, memory-based activities of daily living (mADLs), and self-efficacy were completed. The calendar training group demonstrated significant improvement in mADLs compared to controls, while the computer training group did not. Calendar training may be more effective in improving mADLs than computerized intervention. However, this study highlights how behavioral trials with fewer than 30–50 participants per arm are likely underpowered, resulting in seemingly null findings.
机译:这项前瞻性研究研究了计算机日历日历训练与代偿性日历训练对患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的认知康复参与者的功能影响。记忆消除MCI的57名参与者完成了随机分配的日历或计算机培训。使用标准护理对照组进行比较。依从性,基于记忆的日常生活活动(mADLs)和自我效能的测量已完成。日历训练组显示出与对照组相比,mADLs有显着改善,而计算机训练组则没有。日历培训可能比计算机干预更有效地改善mADL。但是,这项研究强调了每只手臂少于30至50名参与者的行为试验如何可能功能不足,从而导致看似无效的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号