首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology >An International Marine-Atmospheric 222Rn Measurement Intercomparison in Bermuda Part II: Results for the Participating Laboratories
【2h】

An International Marine-Atmospheric 222Rn Measurement Intercomparison in Bermuda Part II: Results for the Participating Laboratories

机译:百慕大国际海洋-大气222Rn测量比对第二部分:参与实验室的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As part of an international measurement intercomparison of instruments used to measure atmospheric 222Rn, four participating laboratories made nearly simultaneous measurements of 222Rn activity concentration in commonly sampled, ambient air over approximately a 2 week period, and three of these four laboratories participated in the measurement comparison of 14 introduced samples with known, but undisclosed (“blind”) 222Rn activity concentration. The exercise was conducted in Bermuda in October 1991. The 222Rn activity concentrations in ambient Bermudian air over the course of the intercomparison ranged from a few hundredths of a Bq · m−3 to about 2 Bq · m−3, while the standardized sample additions covered a range from approximately 2.5 Bq · m−3 to 35 Bq · m−3. The overall uncertainty in the latter concentrations was in the general range of 10 %, approximating a 3 standard deviation uncertainty interval. The results of the intercomparison indicated that two of the laboratories were within very good agreement with the standard additions, and almost within expected statistical variations. These same two laboratories, however, at lower ambient concentrations, exhibited a systematic difference with an averaged offset of roughly 0.3 Bq · m−3. The third laboratory participating in the measurement of standardized sample additions was systematically low by about 65 % to 70 %, with respect to the standard addition which was also confirmed in their ambient air concentration measurements. The fourth laboratory, participating in only the ambient measurement part of the intercomparison, was also systematically low by at least 40 % with respect to the first two laboratories.
机译:作为用于测量大气 222 Rn的仪器的国际测量比对的一部分,四个参与实验室几乎同时测量了通常采样的周围空气中 222 Rn的活动浓度在两个星期内,这四个实验室中的三个参加了对14个引入的,但未公开(“盲”) 222 Rn活性浓度的样品的测量比较。这项运动于1991年10月在百慕大进行。在比较过程中,百慕大环境空气中的 222 Rn活性浓度范围为Bq·m −3 到大约2 Bq·m −3 ,而标准样品添加范围从大约2.5 Bq·m -3 到35 Bq·m −3 。后一种浓度的总体不确定度通常在10%的范围内,大约为3个标准差不确定度区间。比较结果表明,两个实验室与标准添加实验室非常吻合,并且几乎在预期的统计差异之内。但是,这两个实验室在较低的环境浓度下表现出系统差异,平均偏差约为0.3 Bq·m -3 。相对于标准添加量,参与标准样品添加量测量的第三家实验室的系统性降低了约65%至70%,这在他们的环境空气浓度测量中也得到了证实。相对于前两个实验室,仅参与比较的环境测量部分的第四个实验室也有系统地降低了至少40%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号