首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Rural Medicine : JRM >Comparison of Therapeutic G-CSF Cycles and Prophylactic G-CSF Cycles inPatients Receiving Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer:A Retrospective Study Report
【2h】

Comparison of Therapeutic G-CSF Cycles and Prophylactic G-CSF Cycles inPatients Receiving Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer:A Retrospective Study Report

机译:治疗性G-CSF周期与预防性G-CSF周期的比较接受紫杉醇和卡铂联合化疗治疗卵巢癌的患者:回顾性研究报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences between therapeutic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) cycles and prophylactic G-CSF cycles in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.>Material and Method: Medical records of 15 women who received paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer between January 2003 and December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. All 15 patients completed 6 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin as the first-line chemotherapy. The complications were compared between therapeutic G-CSF cycles and prophylactic G-CSF cycles.>Results: The number of chemotherapy cycles correlated with the ratio of prophylactic G-CSF cycles. It was considered that earlier prophylactic G-CSF injections were chosen due to a gradual decrease in WBC and neutrophil counts. The WBC and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in prophylactic G-CSF cycles than in therapeutic G-CSF cycles. However, there were no significant differences in the intervals of chemotherapy, delay of chemotherapy, and incidence of febrile neutropenia between the therapeutic G-CSF and prophylactic G-CSF cycles.>Conclusion: Prophylactic G-CSF injections were not effective in preventing the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.
机译:>目的:本研究的目的是研究紫杉醇和卡铂联合化疗治疗卵巢癌患者的治疗性粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)周期与预防性G-CSF周期之间的差异>材料与方法:回顾性分析了2003年1月至2012年12月间接受紫杉醇和卡铂联合化疗治疗卵巢癌的15例妇女的病历。全部15例患者完成了紫杉醇和卡铂的6疗程作为一线化疗。比较了治疗性G-CSF周期和预防性G-CSF周期之间的并发症。>结果:化疗周期的数量与预防性G-CSF周期的比率相关。认为由于WBC和中性粒细胞计数的逐渐降低,选择了较早的预防性G-CSF注射。预防性G-CSF周期的WBC和中性粒细胞计数显着高于治疗性G-CSF周期。但是,治疗性G-CSF和预防性G-CSF周期之间的化疗间隔,化疗延迟和发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率没有显着差异。>结论:在接受紫杉醇和卡铂联合化疗治疗卵巢癌的患者中,不能有效预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症的发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号