【2h】

Review of Rule Modification in Sport

机译:运动规则修改的回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The goal of this qualitative review was to analyze the state of the bibliography about rule modification in sport. In the literature reviewed, there are few studies of rule modification and related aspects. Most studies omit mentioning the purpose of the modifications, but they do refer to the goals of their analysis (improving players' performance, attracting spectators and athletes, attending to commercial pressure, adapting the sport to children’s needs and interests, preventing injuries). Eighty percent of the studies did not report the outcome of the previous modifications they analyzed. More than half of the studies (60%) achieved the proposed goals. Nearly two-thirds (63.83%) analyzed the effect of rule modification on game actions occurring during the game or through a test. Most of the studies (91.5%) did not consult the participants. Three-fourths of the studies (74.46%) examined the effect of rule modification without any knowledge of a previous analysis or without any previous analysis, and 74.47% studied rule modification related to internal logic. Modifications to be introduced in a sport should be analyzed through a reflective process before their final introduction. The following points should be considered: establishing goals, respecting the basic rules without modifying them, becoming familiar with players’ and coaches’ opinions, determining the effect of the modification on a wide spectrum of variables, elaborating useful proposals for the organizations that are responsible for competitions, using more than one type of data, modifying the internal logic and, preferably, the functional rules, and following some basic stages to consolidate rule modification.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Rule modification involves processes that seek change in the game conditions with a certain goal in mind.The rules related to internal logic model the game actions that are characteristic of a sport.Functional rules facilitate achieving the goals.There are few valid research studies on which to base the modifications.Modifications in a sport should be validated after a reflective process before they are introduced.
机译:定性审查的目的是分析有关运动规则修改的书目状态。在回顾的文献中,很少有关于规则修改和相关方面的研究。大多数研究都忽略了修改的目的,但确实引用了分析的目的(提高运动员的表现,吸引观众和运动员,承受商业压力,使这项运动适应儿童的需求和兴趣,防止受伤)。 80%的研究未报告他们所分析的先前修改的结果。超过一半的研究(60%)实现了建议的目标。将近三分之二(63.83%)的人分析了规则修改对游戏期间或通过测试进行的游戏动作的影响。大多数研究(91.5%)没有咨询参与者。四分之三的研究(74.46%)在不了解任何先前分析或没有任何先前分析的情况下检查了规则修改的效果,而74.47%的研究则研究了与内部逻辑相关的规则修改。在最终引入之前,应该通过反思过程来分析运动中要引入的修改。应考虑以下几点:建立目标,在不修改基本规则的情况下遵守基本规则,熟悉运动员和教练的意见,确定修改对各种变量的影响,为负责组织制定有用的建议对于比赛,使用一种以上类型的数据,修改内部逻辑(最好是功能规则),并遵循一些基本阶段以巩固规则修改。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type :disc“> <!-list-behavior =无序前缀词= mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 规则修改涉及以特定目标寻求改变游戏条件的过程 与内部逻辑相关的规则可以模拟一项运动的运动行为。 功能性规则有助于实现目标。 有进行修改的有效研究很少。 M在进行一项体育运动中的修饰词之前,应先进行反思性验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号