首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B >Magnetic cell sorting and flow cytometry sorting methods for the isolation and function analysis of mouse CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells
【2h】

Magnetic cell sorting and flow cytometry sorting methods for the isolation and function analysis of mouse CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells

机译:磁性细胞分选和流式细胞仪分选方法用于小鼠CD4 + CD25 + Treg细胞的分离和功能分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: In this paper we compared the two methods of cell sorting (magnetic cell sorting and flow cytometry sorting) for the isolation and function analysis of mouse CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells, in order to inform further studies in Treg cell function. Methods: We separately used magnetic cell sorting and flow cytometry sorting to identify CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells. After magnetic cell separation, we further used flow cytometry to analyze the purity of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, trypan blue staining to detect cell viability, and propidium iodide (PI) staining to assess the cell viability. We detected the immune inhibition of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells in the in vitro proliferation experiments. Results: The results showed that compared to flow cytometry sorting, magnetic cell sorting took more time and effort, but fewer live cells were obtained than with flow cytometry sorting. The CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, however, obtained with both methods have similar immunosuppressive capacities. Conclusion: The result suggests that both methods can be used in isolating CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, and one can select the best method according to specific needs and availability of the methodologies.
机译:目的:本文比较了两种细胞分选方法(磁性细胞分选和流式细胞仪分选)对小鼠CD4 + CD25 + 调节性T细胞的分离和功能分析。 (Treg)细胞,以告知有关Treg细胞功能的进一步研究。方法:我们分别使用磁性细胞分选和流式细胞仪分选来鉴定CD4 + CD25 + Treg细胞。磁性细胞分离后,我们进一步使用流式细胞仪分析CD4 + CD25 + Treg细胞的纯度,台盼蓝染色检测细胞活力,以及碘化丙锭(PI)染色以评估细胞活力。在体外增殖实验中,我们检测到了CD4 + CD25 + Treg细胞的免疫抑制作用。结果:结果表明,与流式细胞仪分选相比,磁性细胞分选花费更多的时间和精力,但是与流式细胞仪分选相比,获得的活细胞更少。然而,两种方法获得的CD4 + CD25 + Treg细胞具有相似的免疫抑制能力。结论:结果表明,两种方法均可用于分离CD4 + CD25 + Treg细胞,并且可以根据具体需要和方法的可用性选择最佳方法。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号