首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience >Fact vs fiction—how paratextual information shapes our reading processes
【2h】

Fact vs fiction—how paratextual information shapes our reading processes

机译:事实与虚构-超文本信息如何塑造我们的阅读过程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Our life is full of stories: some of them depict real-life events and were reported, e.g. in the daily news or in autobiographies, whereas other stories, as often presented to us in movies and novels, are fictional. However, we have only little insights in the neurocognitive processes underlying the reading of factual as compared to fictional contents. We investigated the neurocognitive effects of reading short narratives, labeled to be either factual or fictional. Reading in a factual mode engaged an activation pattern suggesting an action-based reconstruction of the events depicted in a story. This process seems to be past-oriented and leads to shorter reaction times at the behavioral level. In contrast, the brain activation patterns corresponding to reading fiction seem to reflect a constructive simulation of what might have happened. This is in line with studies on imagination of possible past or future events.
机译:我们的生活中充满了故事:其中一些故事描述了现实生活中的事件,并被报道,例如在日常新闻或自传中,而其他在电影和小说中经常出现的故事都是虚构的。但是,与虚构内容相比,我们在了解事实的潜在神经认知过程中只有很少的见识。我们研究了阅读简短叙述(被标记为事实或虚构内容)的神经认知作用。以事实模式阅读涉及一种激活模式,该模式建议对故事中描述的事件进行基于动作的重构。这个过程似乎是过去的导向,并导致行为水平的反应时间缩短。相反,与阅读小说对应的大脑激活模式似乎反映了可能发生的情况的建设性模拟。这与对过去或将来可能发生的事件的想象力研究相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号