首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Scientific World Journal >Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions
【2h】

Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions

机译:改进的Monier-Williams方法与电化学方法测定水溶液中亚硫酸盐的临界比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the present work, known concentration of sulfite aqueous solutions in the presence and absence of gallic acid was measured to corroborate the validity of modified Monier-Williams method. Free and bound-sulfite was estimated by differential pulse voltammetry. To our surprise, the modified Monier-Williams method (also known as aspiration method) showed to be very inaccurate for free-sulfite, although suitable for bound-sulfite determination. The differential pulse approach, using the standard addition method and a correction coefficient, proved to be swift, cheap, and very precise and accurate.
机译:在本工作中,测量了在没食子酸存在和不存在的情况下已知亚硫酸盐水溶液的浓度,以证实改进的Monier-Williams方法的有效性。通过差分脉冲伏安法估算游离和结合的亚硫酸盐。令我们惊讶的是,改进的Monier-Williams方法(也称为抽吸方法)对游离亚硫酸盐非常不准确,尽管它适用于结合亚硫酸盐的测定。使用标准加法和校正系数的差分脉冲方法被证明是快速,廉价,非常精确和准确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号