首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Medical priority dispatch codes—comparison with National Early Warning Score
【2h】

Medical priority dispatch codes—comparison with National Early Warning Score

机译:医疗优先级调度代码-与国家早期预警得分相比

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn Finland, calls for emergency medical services are prioritized by educated non-medical personnel into four categories—from A (highest risk) to D (lowest risk)—following a criteria-based national dispatch protocol. Discrepancies in triage may result in risk overestimation, leading to inappropriate use of emergency medical services units and to risk underestimation that can negatively impact patient outcome. To evaluate dispatch protocol accuracy, we assessed association between priority assigned at dispatch and the patient’s condition assessed by emergency medical services on the scene using an early warning risk assessment tool.
机译:背景技术在芬兰,按照基于标准的国家派遣协议,受过良好教育的非医务人员应将呼叫的优先级分为四类-从A(最高风险)到D(最低风险)。分诊的差异可能会导致风险高估,从而导致对急诊医疗服务单位的不当使用,并可能导致风险低估,从而对患者的预后产生负面影响。为了评估调度协议的准确性,我们使用预警风险评估工具评估了调度中分配的优先级与现场紧急医疗服务评估的患者状况之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号