首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sarcoma >A Systematic Literature Review of Adverse Events Associated with Systemic Treatments Used in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
【2h】

A Systematic Literature Review of Adverse Events Associated with Systemic Treatments Used in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

机译:文献报道的晚期软组织肉瘤的不良反应与全身治疗相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This systematic literature review describes adverse events (AEs) among patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who received second-line or later anticancer therapies. Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of adults with advanced or metastatic STS who received systemic anticancer therapy before enrollment in a randomized-controlled trial of pazopanib, another targeted cancer agent, or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Of 204 publications identified, seven articles representing six unique studies met inclusion criteria. Additional safety results for pazopanib were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Hematologic toxicities were common with all therapies evaluated (pazopanib, trabectedin, dacarbazine ± gemcitabine, gemcitabine ± docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and ifosfamide). Studies differed in AE type, timing of assessment, and outcomes reported, although patient populations and AE assessment timing were relatively similar for pazopanib and trabectedin. AEs that were more common with trabectedin than pazopanib were anemia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, and elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase. An AE that was more common with pazopanib than trabectedin was anorexia. Only the pazopanib study reported AE frequencies versus placebo. A planned meta-analysis was not feasible, as there was no common comparator. More well-designed studies that include common comparators are needed for comparison of safety effects among treatments for STS.
机译:这篇系统的文献综述描述了接受二线或更晚抗癌治疗的软组织肉瘤(STS)患者中的不良事件(AE)。在PubMed,EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中心登记册中进行了研究,以研究患有晚期或转移性STS的成年人,这些成年人在接受另一种靶向癌症药物帕唑帕尼或细胞毒性化疗的随机对照试验之前接受了系统性抗癌治疗。在确定的204种出版物中,代表六项独特研究的七篇文章符合纳入标准。在临床试验.gov上确定了帕唑帕尼的其他安全性结果。血液学毒性在所有评估的疗法中均很常见(帕唑帕尼,曲贝汀,达卡巴嗪±吉西他滨,吉西他滨±多西紫杉醇,环磷酰胺和异环磷酰胺)。尽管在帕唑帕尼和曲布帕汀的患者人群和AE评估时机相对相似,但研究在AE类型,评估时机和所报告的结局方面存在差异。曲贝汀比帕唑帕尼更常见的不良事件是贫血,中性粒细胞减少,恶心/呕吐以及天冬氨酸转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶升高。帕唑帕尼比trabectedin更常见的AE是厌食症。只有帕唑帕尼研究报告了AE频率与安慰剂的关系。计划中的荟萃分析不可行,因为没有通用的比较器。为了比较STS治疗之间的安全性效果,需要设计更完善的研究,包括常见的比较剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号