首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders >Efficacy of Duloxetine on Painful Physical Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder for Patients With Clinically Significant Painful Physical Symptoms at Baseline: A Meta-Analysis of 11 Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials
【2h】

Efficacy of Duloxetine on Painful Physical Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder for Patients With Clinically Significant Painful Physical Symptoms at Baseline: A Meta-Analysis of 11 Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

机译:在基线时度洛西汀对重度抑郁症临床上显着疼痛性身体症状的患者的疼痛性身体症状的功效:11种双盲安慰剂对照临床试验的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To review efficacy of duloxetine for physical symptoms and depressive illness in patients with at least mild to moderate major depressive disorder (MDD; DSM-IV) and clinically significant painful physical symptoms at baseline.>Data Sources: Global database of duloxetine clinical trials (Eli Lilly and Company).>Study Selection: All 11 acute, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of duloxetine (7 with duloxetine 60-mg doses and 4 with non–60-mg doses) in the database that used a scale to measure painful physical symptoms and were completed before March 17, 2011.>Data Extraction: For each study, patients with clinically significant pain levels at baseline (Visual Analog Scale overall pain rating ≥ 30, Numerical Rating Scale score ≥ 3, or Brief Pain Inventory 24-hour average pain rating ≥ 3) were selected in order to determine the effect sizes of duloxetine (compared with placebo for each trial) on the pain and depression measures. Overall effect sizes for both painful physical symptoms and MDD were obtained from the mean of individual-trial effect sizes, and each effect size was weighted relative to the number of patients within each study.>Data Synthesis: The overall mean effect sizes were as follows: painful physical symptoms—60-mg trials, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.52); non–60-mg trials, 0.13 (95% CI, −0.19 to 0.45); MDD—60-mg trials, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.40); non–60-mg trials, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.32). Across the 11 studies, the weighted effect size for painful physical symptoms was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.51) and for MDD, 0.25 (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.34).>Conclusions: According to this meta-analysis, duloxetine 60 mg once daily is as effective in improving painful physical symptoms as it is for depression in patients with MDD and clinically significant painful physical symptoms. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that duloxetine has small effect sizes in reducing painful physical symptoms and depressive symptoms in patients with MDD and clinically significant pain levels at baseline. Thus, the results of the study permit one to conclude that duloxetine has a clinically significant impact on painful physical symptoms and in reducing the severity of depressive symptoms. However, the results do not address its efficacy compared to other alternatives, as in all studies the comparator was placebo.
机译:>目的:回顾度洛西汀对至少轻度至中度重度抑郁症(MDD; DSM-IV)且在基线时具有临床上明显的疼痛性物理症状的患者的身体症状和抑郁症的疗效。>数据来源:度洛西汀临床试验的全球数据库(礼来公司)。>研究选择:所有11项度洛西汀的急性,双盲,安慰剂对照研究(7项与度洛西汀60- mg剂量和4剂非60 mg剂量)在2011年3月17日之前完成,该量表用于测量疼痛的身体症状。>数据提取:选择基线时显着的疼痛水平(视觉模拟量表总体疼痛评分≥30,数字评分量表评分≥3或简短疼痛量表24小时平均疼痛评分≥3),以确定度洛西汀的疗效大小(与安慰剂比较)每次试验)的痛苦和抑郁症措施。疼痛性身体症状和MDD的总体效应大小是从单个试验效应大小的平均值中获得的,并且每种效应大小是相对于每个研究中的患者人数加权的。>数据综合:平均效应大小如下:痛苦的身体症状-60毫克试验,0.29(95%CI,0.06至0.52);非60 mg试验,0.13(95%CI,−0.19至0.45); MDD-60毫克试验,0.29(95%CI,0.18至0.40);非60 mg试验,0.16(95%CI,0.00至0.32)。在11项研究中,疼痛性身体症状的加权效应量为0.26(95%CI,0.00至0.51),MDD为0.25(95%CI,0.16至0.34)。>结论:这项荟萃分析显示,每天60 mg度洛西汀每天一次可以有效改善疼痛的身体症状,对于患有MDD和临床上明显的疼痛性身体症状的患者而言,抑郁症的缓解效果也一样。这项荟萃分析的结果表明,度洛西汀在减轻MDD患者和基线时临床上显着的疼痛水平的患者的痛苦物理症状和抑郁症状方面效果较小。因此,研究结果使人们得出结论,度洛西汀对疼痛的身体症状和减轻抑郁症状的严重程度具有临床意义。但是,与其他替代品相比,该结果并未解决其功效,因为在所有研究中,比较剂均为安慰剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号