...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >The Relationship Between Baseline Clinical Symptom Characteristics and Working Ability in Japanese Patients Treated for Major Depressive Disorder and Painful Physical Symptoms
【24h】

The Relationship Between Baseline Clinical Symptom Characteristics and Working Ability in Japanese Patients Treated for Major Depressive Disorder and Painful Physical Symptoms

机译:基线临床症状特征与日本患者的工作能力的关系,治疗重大抑郁症和痛苦的身体症状

获取原文

摘要

Purpose:The objective of this post hoc analysis was to explore the relationship, including changes over time, between baseline clinical symptom characteristics and working ability, judged by investigators, after 12 weeks of antidepressant monotherapy in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and painful physical symptoms (PPS) in a real-world clinical setting.Patients and Methods:This prospective, observational study in patients treated with duloxetine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors was conducted from 2014 to 2016. Both treatment groups were pooled and divided into 2 groups, "working ability recovered" or "working ability not recovered," based on working ability at the end of the study. Patients were also divided into 4 subgroups by the presence or absence of previous depressive episodes and working ability. Main outcome measures included baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, and the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17).Results:Comparison between "working ability recovered" (n=122) and "working ability not recovered" (n=91) showed that the percentage of patients with complications and psychotherapy at baseline, and baseline HAM-D17 total, insomnia, somatic, and anxiety scores, were significantly different. The results of subgroup analyses were mostly the same as the results analyzed by working ability alone. Although statistical differences were observed for some outcome measures, the differences at baseline, except use of psychotherapy, may not be applicable clinically, and there were no specific trends observed that could predict working ability.Conclusion:This post hoc analysis suggested that most baseline clinical characteristics, including the presence or absence of previous depressive episodes, were not predictive of working ability recovery. However, the use of psychotherapy in parallel with antidepressant monotherapy may be positively associated with working ability recovery. All outcome measures improved over time, reinforcing the importance of continuous treatment and observation to improve and accurately judge working ability in patients with MDD and PPS.? 2020 Sugawara et al.
机译:目的:这种情况下的目的是探讨了这种关系,包括随时间的变化,基线临床症状特征和研究人员之间,调查人员在日本主要抑郁症(MDD)的抗抑郁症单药治疗后12周后判断现实世界临床环境中的痛苦的身体症状(PPS)患者和方法:从2014年至2016年开始使用Duloxetine或选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂的患者的前瞻性观察性研究。合并两组治疗组并分为2组,“努力恢复”或“工作能力未恢复”,基​​于研究结束时的工作能力。患者也通过存在或不存在以前的抑郁发作和工作能力分为4个亚组。主要结果措施包括基线人口统计学和临床​​特征,以及抑郁症的17项汉密尔顿评级规模(HAM-D17)。结果:“工作能力恢复”(n = 122)之间的比较和“工作能力未恢复”(n = 91)显示,基线并发症和心理治疗的患者的百分比,以及基线火腿D17总,失眠,体细胞和焦虑评分,显着不同。亚组分析的结果大多是通过单独工作能力分析的结果相同。虽然对某些结果措施观察到统计差异,但除了使用心理治疗外,基线的差异可能在临床上不适用,并且没有观察到可以预测工作能力的具体趋势。结论:这种哨所分析表明大多数基线临床特征,包括先前抑郁发作的存在或不存在,没有预测工作能力恢复。然而,与抗抑郁单疗法平行使用心理治疗可能与工作能力恢复正相关。所有结果措施随着时间的推移而改善,加强了持续治疗和观察的重要性,以改善和准确地判断MDD和PPS患者的工作能力。 2020 Sugawara等。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号