首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncotarget >Comparison of analytic performances of Cellsearch and iFISH approach in detecting circulating tumor cells
【2h】

Comparison of analytic performances of Cellsearch and iFISH approach in detecting circulating tumor cells

机译:Cellsearch和iFISH方法在检测循环肿瘤细胞中的分析性能比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been widely used to predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the performances of Cellsearch and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) in detecting CTCs in breast cancer patients. Forty-five newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and 14 healthy donors were recruited and their CTCs were detected by both Cellsearch and iFISH. Correlation between clinicopathological features and CTCs was investigated. We found that the positive rate of CTC detected by iFISH was significantly higher than by Cellsearch system (91% vs 38%). The CTC count, detected either by iFISH or Cellsearch, was not significantly associated with clinical pictures of patients with breast cancer. Therefore, we concluded that, compared to conventional Cellsearch CTC detection, in situ karyotypic identification performed by iFISH had higher detection rate. Therefore, iFISH may be more clinically useful than Cellsearch system.
机译:循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)已被广泛用于预测乳腺癌患者的预后。本研究的目的是比较Cellsearch和免疫染色荧光原位杂交(iFISH)在检测乳腺癌患者中CTC的性能。招募了45名新诊断的乳腺癌患者和14名健康捐献者,并通过Cellsearch和iFISH检测了他们的CTC。研究了临床病理特征和CTC之间的相关性。我们发现,iFISH检测到的CTC阳性率显着高于Cellsearch系统(91%比38%)。通过iFISH或Cellsearch检测到的CTC计数与乳腺癌患者的临床照片无显着相关性。因此,我们得出的结论是,与常规Cellsearch CTC检测相比,iFISH进行的原位核型鉴定具有更高的检测率。因此,iFISH可能比Cellsearch系统在临床上更有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号