首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncotarget >Pathological complete response after cisplatin neoadjuvant therapy is associated with the downregulation of DNA repair genes in BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancers
【2h】

Pathological complete response after cisplatin neoadjuvant therapy is associated with the downregulation of DNA repair genes in BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancers

机译:顺铂新辅助疗法后的病理完全反应与BRCA1相关的三阴性乳腺癌中DNA修复基因的下调有关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered a suitable surrogate marker of treatment efficacy in patients with triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying pCR as a result of such treatment remain obscure. Using real-time PCR arrays we compared the expression levels of 120 genes involved in the main mechanisms of DNA repair in 43 pretreatment biopsies of BRCA1-associated TNBCs exhibiting pCR and no pathological complete response (non-pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin. Altogether, 25 genes were significantly differentially expressed between tumors exhibiting pCR and non-pCR, and these genes were downregulated in the pCR group compared to the non-pCR group. A difference in expression level greater than 1.5-fold was detected for nine genes: MGMT, ERCC4, FANCB, UBA1, XRCC5, XPA, XPC, PARP3, and RPA1. The non-homologous end joining and nucleotide excision repair pathways of DNA repair showed the most significant relevance. Expression profile of DNA repair genes associated with pCR was different in the node-positive (20 genes with fold change >1.5) and node-negative (only 3 genes) subgroups. Although BRCA1 germline mutations are the principal defects in BRCA1-associated TNBC, our results indicate that the additional downregulation of other genes engaged in major pathways of DNA repair may play a decisive role in the pathological response of these tumors to cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The results suggest that patients with node-positive BRCA1-associated TNBCs that do not exhibit pCR after cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be candidates for subsequent therapy with PARP inhibitors, whereas UBA1 may be a potential therapeutic target in node-negative subgroup.
机译:新辅助化疗后的病理完全缓解(pCR)被认为是三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者治疗效果的合适替代指标。然而,由于这种治疗而导致的pCR的分子机制仍然不清楚。使用实时PCR阵列,我们比较了43例BRCA1相关的TNBC预处理活检组织中涉及DNA修复主要机制的120个基因的表达水平,这些活检组织显示pCR且顺铂新辅助化疗后无病理完全反应(非pCR)。共有25个基因在显示pCR和非pCR的肿瘤之间显着差异表达,与非pCR组相比,这些基因在pCR组中被下调。检测到九种基因的表达水平差异大于1.5倍:MGMT,ERCC4,FANCB,UBA1,XRCC5,XPA,XPC,PARP3和RPA1。 DNA修复的非同源末端连接和核苷酸切除修复途径显示出最重要的相关性。与pCR相关的DNA修复基因的表达谱在淋巴结阳性(20个倍数变化> 1.5的基因)和淋巴结阴性(仅3个基因)亚组中有所不同。尽管BRCA1种系突变是与BRCA1相关的TNBC的主要缺陷,但我们的结果表明,参与DNA修复主要途径的其他基因的额外下调可能在这些肿瘤对顺铂新辅助化疗的病理反应中起决定性作用。结果表明,在顺铂新辅助化疗后未显示pCR的淋巴结阳性BRCA1相关TNBC患者可能是随后接受PARP抑制剂治疗的候选人,而UBA1可能是淋巴结阴性亚组的潜在治疗靶标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号