首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Effects of Consuming a Low Dose of Alcohol with Mixers Containing Carbohydrate or Artificial Sweetener on Simulated Driving Performance
【2h】

Effects of Consuming a Low Dose of Alcohol with Mixers Containing Carbohydrate or Artificial Sweetener on Simulated Driving Performance

机译:含碳水化合物或人造甜味剂的混合机食用低剂量酒精对模拟驾驶性能的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Australian National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC) devised gender-based drinking recommendations to ensure blood or equivalized breath alcohol concentrations (BrAC) remain <0.050%. However, these may be inappropriate for individuals consuming alcohol without carbohydrate (CHO), which results in higher BrACs. This study investigated the effects of ingesting alcohol with and without CHO on BrACs and simulated driving performance. Thirty-two participants (16 males; age: 23 ± 6 years) completed two randomized single-blinded trials. Participants performed a baseline drive (Drive 1), then an experimental drive (Drive 2), following alcohol consumption (males: 20 g; females: 10 g). Alcoholic beverages contained either 25 g sucrose or aspartame (AS). Driving performance was assessed using lateral control (standard deviation of lane position [SDLP] and number of lane departures) and risk-taking (number of overtaking maneuvers and maximum overtaking speed). BrAC and subjective ratings (e.g., intoxication) were also assessed. BrAC was significantly lower as Drive 2 commenced with CHO compared to AS (0.022 ± 0.008% vs. 0.030 ± 0.011%). Two males provided BrACs >0.050% with AS. Neither beverage influenced changes to simulated driving performance. Ingesting alcohol in quantities advised by the NDARC results in no detectable simulated driving impairment. However, the likelihood of exceeding the legal drink-driving BrAC is increased when alcohol is consumed with artificially-sweetened mixers.
机译:澳大利亚国家毒品和酒精研究中心(NDARC)制定了基于性别的饮酒建议,以确保血液或相等的呼吸酒精浓度(BrAC)保持<0.050%。但是,这些可能不适用于个人饮用不含碳水化合物(CHO)的酒精,这会导致更高的BrAC。这项研究调查了摄入和不摄入CHO的酒精对BrAC的影响并模拟了驾驶性能。 32名参与者(16名男性;年龄:23​​±6岁)完成了两项随机单盲试验。参与者在饮酒(雄性:20 g;雌性:10 g)之后进行了基线驱动(驱动1),然后是实验驱动(驱动2)。含酒精的饮料含25克蔗糖或阿斯巴甜(AS)。使用横向控制(车道位置标准偏差[SDLP]和车道偏离次数)和冒险行为(超车次数和最大超车速度)来评估驾驶性能。还评估了BrAC和主观评分(例如中毒)。与AS相比,从Drive 2开始使用CHO开始,BrAC显着降低(0.022±0.008%与0.030±0.011%)。两名男性为AS提供BrAC> 0.050%。两种饮料都不会影响模拟驾驶性能的变化。 NDARC建议摄入大量酒精,不会导致可检测的模拟驾驶障碍。但是,当使用人工加糖的混合器消耗酒精时,超过法定的酒驾BrAC的可能性会增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号