首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Spine Surgery >ISASS Policy Statement - Cervical Interbody
【2h】

ISASS Policy Statement - Cervical Interbody

机译:ISASS政策声明-颈椎椎间融合器

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Morgan Lorio, MD, FACS, Chair, ISASS Task Force on Coding & ReimbursementIn 2011, CPT code 22551 was revised to combine or bundle CPT codes 63075 and 22554 when both procedures were performed at the same site/same surgical session. The add on code +22552 is used to report each additional interspace. 2014 heralded a downward pressure on this now prime target code (for non-coverage?) 22551 through an egregious insurer attempt to redefine cervical arthrodesis, effectively removing spine surgeon choice and altering best practice without clinical evidence. Currently, spine surgeons are equally split on the use of allograft versus cages for cervical arthrodesis. Structural allograft, CPT code 20931, is reported once per same surgical session, regardless of the number of allografts used. CPT code 22851 which is designated solely for cage use, has a higher reimbursement than structural allograft, and may be reported for each inner space. Hence, the rationale behind why some payers wrongly consider “spine cages NOT medically necessary for cervical fusion.” A timely consensus paper summarizing spine surgeon purview on the logical progressive evolution of cervical interbody fusion for ISASS/IASP membership was strategically identified as an advocacy focus by the ISASS Task Force. ISASS appreciates the authors’ charge with gratitude. This article has both teeth and transparent clinical real-world merit.
机译:Morgan Lorio,MD,FACS,ISASS编码与报销工作组主席2011年,对CPT代码22551进行了修订,以在两种手术在同一地点/同一手术时间进行时将CPT代码63075和22554合并或捆绑在一起。附加代码+22552用于报告每个其他的间隔。 2014年,保险公司试图重新定义颈椎关节病,有效地消除了脊柱外科医生的选择并改变了最佳实践,而没有临床证据,这预示着该主要目标法规(未覆盖?)22551面临下行压力。目前,脊柱外科医生在使用同种异体移植物和笼子进行颈椎关节固定术方面均受到同样的划分。每次使用同一个外科手术报告一次结构同种异体移植物(CPT代码20931),而与所用同种异体移植物的数量无关。 CPT代码22851仅用于笼子,与同种异体结构相比,其报销费用更高,并且可能会报告每个内部空间。因此,某些付款人错误地认为“颈椎融合器在医学上不是必需的”的背后原因。 ISASS工作组从战略上将及时总结出共识,总结了脊柱外科医生对ISASS / IASP会员间颈椎椎间融合术的逻辑渐进性发展的合理看法。 ISASS感谢作者的谢意。本文既有牙齿又有透明的临床实际价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号