首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Drug Design Development and Therapy >Comparison of the long-term efficacy and safety of generic Tacrobell with original tacrolimus (Prograf) in kidney transplant recipients
【2h】

Comparison of the long-term efficacy and safety of generic Tacrobell with original tacrolimus (Prograf) in kidney transplant recipients

机译:普鲁他克铃与原始他克莫司(Prograf)在肾移植受者中的长期疗效和安全性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a generic tacrolimus (Tacrobell [TCB]) compared to the original tacrolimus (Prograf [PGF]) in kidney transplant recipients. In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the data from 444 patients who took TCB as a first-line immunosuppressive drug and 245 patients who took PGF. The 5-year graft survival rate was 92% for patients in the PGF group and 97% for patients in the TCB group, respectively. Cox proportional hazards for a one-sided, noninferiority model showed noninferiority (upper confidence interval [CI] limit of the hazard ratio [HR]<1.2) for TCB compared to PGF (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0–1.14). The 5-year patient survival rate was 96% for patients in the PGF group and 97% for patients in the TCB group. Cox proportional hazards for a one-sided, noninferiority model showed noninferiority (upper confidence interval limit of the HR<2.0) for TCB compared to PGF (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0–1.95). The 5-year acute rejection-free graft survival rate was not significantly different between the groups (TCB 67%, PGF 68.8%; P=0.6286). The incidence of adverse events including adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, malignancies, new-onset diabetes after transplantation, and infection events did not differ significantly between the two groups. We conclude that TCB is a comparable alternative to the original tacrolimus as a first-line immunosuppressive drug. Producers of generics should support further study of their products after approval to assure physicians of their efficacy and safety.
机译:这项研究旨在评估与他克莫司(Prograf [PGF])相比,普通他克莫司(Tacrobell [TCB])的长期疗效和安全性。在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们分析了444例将TCB作为一线免疫抑制药物的患者和245例使用PGF的患者的数据。 PGF组患者的5年移植物存活率分别为92%和TCB组患者的97%。对于单侧非劣效性模型,Cox比例风险显示非劣效性(相对于PGF,TCB的劣势性(危险比的上限置信区间[CI]限制[HR] <1.2))(PHR为0.58; 95%CI为0.1-1.44)。 PGF组的5年患者生存率为96%,TCB组的5年患者生存率为97%。与PGF相比,单侧非劣效模型的Cox比例风险显示TCB的非劣效性(HR <2.0的置信区间上限)(HR:0.83; 95%CI:0-1.95)。两组之间的5年急性无排斥反应移植生存率无显着差异(TCB 67%,PGF 68.8%; P = 0.6286)。两组的不良事件发生率(包括不良的心血管或脑血管事件,恶性肿瘤,移植后新发糖尿病和感染事件)的发生率无明显差异。我们得出的结论是,TCB是作为第一线免疫抑制药物的原始他克莫司的可替代替代品。仿制药生产商应在批准后支持其产品的进一步研究,以确保医师的功效和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号