首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Differences in Reaction to Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers for Multiple-Choice and Open-Ended Questions
【2h】

Differences in Reaction to Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers for Multiple-Choice and Open-Ended Questions

机译:对即时反馈的反应差异以及对多项选择题和开放式问题的答案进行修改的机会

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There are many reasons to believe that open-ended (OE) and multiple-choice (MC) items elicit different cognitive demands of students. However, empirical evidence that supports this view is lacking. In this study, we investigated the reactions of test takers to an interactive assessment with immediate feedback and answer-revision opportunities for the two types of items. Eighth-grade students solved mathematics problems, both MC and OE, with standard instructions and feedback-and-revision opportunities. An analysis of scores based on revised answers in feedback mode revealed gains in measurement precision for OE items but not for MC items. These results are explained through the concept of effortful engagement—the OE format encourages more mindful engagement with the items in interactive mode. This interpretation is supported by analyses of response times and test takers’ reports.
机译:有很多理由相信开放式(OE)和多项选择(MC)项会引起学生不同的认知需求。但是,缺乏支持这种观点的经验证据。在这项研究中,我们调查了应试者对交互式评估的反应,并为两种类型的项目提供了即时反馈和答案修订机会。八年级的学生通过标准的指导以及反馈和修订机会解决了MC和OE的数学问题。在反馈模式下基于修正答案的分数分析显示,OE项目的测量精度有所提高,而MC项目则没有。通过努力参与的概念可以解释这些结果-OE格式鼓励以交互方式更加谨慎地参与项目。响应时间和应试者报告的分析支持了这种解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号