首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.
【2h】

Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.

机译:体内金属螯合的分子机制:对金属中毒的临床治疗的意义。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Successful in vivo chelation treatment of metal intoxication requires that a significant fraction of the administered chelator in fact chelate the toxic metal. This depends on metal, chelator, and organism-related factors (e.g., ionic diameter, ring size and deformability, hardness/softness of electron donors and acceptors, route of administration, bioavailability, metabolism, organ and intra/extracellular compartmentalization, and excretion). In vivo chelation is not necessarily an equilibrium reaction, determined by the standard stability constant, because rate effects and ligand exchange reactions considerably influence complex formation. Hydrophilic chelators most effectively promote renal metal excretion, but they complex intracellular metal deposits inefficiently. Lipophilic chelators can decrease intracellular stores but may redistribute toxic metals to, for example, the brain. In chronic metal-induced disease, where life-long chelation may be necessary, possible toxicity or side effects of the administered chelator may be limiting. The metal selectivity of chelators is important because of the risk of depletion of the patient's stores of essential metals. Dimercaptosuccinic acid and dimercaptopropionic sulfonate have gained more general acceptance among clinicians, undoubtedly improving the management of many human metal intoxications, including lead, arsenic, and mercury compounds. Still, development of new safer chelators suited for long-term oral administration for chelation of metal deposits (mainly iron), is an important research challenge for the future.
机译:成功的金属中毒体内螯合治疗要求实际上有很大一部分螯合剂螯合有毒金属。这取决于金属,螯合剂和与生物有关的因素(例如,离子直径,环的大小和可变形性,电子供体和受体的硬度/柔软度,给药途径,生物利用度,代谢,器官和细胞内/细胞外区室化和排泄) 。体内螯合不一定是由标准稳定性常数决定的平衡反应,因为速率效应和配体交换反应会显着影响复合物的形成。亲水性螯合剂最有效地促进了肾脏金属的排泄,但它们不能有效地使细胞内金属沉积物复杂化。亲脂性螯合剂可以减少细胞内的储存,但可以将有毒金属重新分布到例如大脑。在慢性金属诱发的疾病中,可能需要终身螯合,所用螯合剂的可能毒性或副作用可能会受到限制。螯合剂的金属选择性很重要,因为有可能耗尽患者必需金属的储存空间。二巯基琥珀酸和二巯基丙磺酸盐已在临床医生中获得了更广泛的接受,无疑改善了许多人类金属中毒的管理,包括铅,砷和汞化合物。尽管如此,开发适合长期口服施用以螯合金属沉积物(主要是铁)的新型更安全的螯合剂仍是未来的重要研究挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号