首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Epidemiology and Infection >Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations
【2h】

Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations

机译:食源性疾病暴发调查中3天和7天召回期的食物消耗参考值比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Investigations into an outbreak of foodborne disease attempt to identify the source of illness as quickly as possible. Population-based reference values for food consumption can assist in investigation by providing comparison data for hypothesis generation and also strengthening the evidence associated with a food product through hypothesis testing. In 2014–2015 a national phone survey was conducted in Canada to collect data on food consumption patterns using a 3- or 7-day recall period. The resulting food consumption values over the two recall periods were compared. The majority of food products did not show a significant difference in the consumption over 3 days and 7 days. However, comparison of reference values from the 3-day recall period to data from an investigation into a Salmonella Infantis outbreak was shown to support the conclusion that chicken was the source of the outbreak whereas the reference values from a 7-day recall did not support this finding. Reference values from multiple recall periods can assist in the hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing phase of foodborne outbreak investigations.
机译:对食源性疾病暴发的调查试图尽快确定疾病的来源。通过提供假设产生的比较数据,并通过假设检验来加强与食品相关的证据,基于人群的食物消费参考值可以协助调查。在2014–2015年,加拿大进行了一次全国电话调查,使用3天或7天的召回期收集有关食物消费模式的数据。比较了两个召回期间的食物消费量值。大多数食品在3天和7天中的消费量没有显着差异。但是,将3天召回期的参考值与沙门氏菌沙门氏菌暴发调查的数据进行比较,可以证明鸡是该暴发源,而7天召回的参考值不支持这种结论。这个发现。来自多个召回期的参考值可有助于食源性疾病暴发调查的假设产生和假设检验阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号