首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology >Physical Vein Models to Quantify the Flow Performance of Sclerosing Foams
【2h】

Physical Vein Models to Quantify the Flow Performance of Sclerosing Foams

机译:物理静脉模型来量化硬化泡沫的流动性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Foam sclerotherapy is clinically employed to treat varicose veins. It involves intravenous injection of foamed surfactant agents causing endothelial wall damage and vessel shrinkage, leading to subsequent neovascularization. Foam production methods used clinically include manual techniques, such as the Double Syringe System (DSS) and Tessari (TSS) methods. Pre-clinical in-vitro studies are conducted to characterize the performance of sclerosing agents; however, the experimental models used often do not replicate physiologically relevant physical and biological conditions. In this study, physical vein models (PVMs) were developed and employed for the first time to characterize the flow behavior of sclerosing foams. PVMs were fabricated in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) by replica molding, and were designed to mimic qualitative geometrical characteristics of veins. Foam behavior was investigated as a function of different physical variables, namely (i) geometry of the vein model (i.e., physiological vs. varicose vein), (ii) foam production technique, and (iii) flow rate of a blood surrogate. The experimental set-up consisted of a PVM positioned on an inclined platform, a syringe pump to control the flow rate of a blood substitute, and a pressure transducer. The static pressure of the blood surrogate at the PVM inlet was measured upon foam administration. The recorded pressure-time curves were analyzed to quantify metrics of foam behavior, with a particular focus on foam expansion and degradation dynamics. Results showed that DSS and TSS foams had similar expansion rate in the physiological PVM, whilst DSS foam had lower expansion rate in the varicose PVM compared to TSS foam. The degradation rate of DSS foam was lower than TSS foam, in both model architectures. Moreover, the background flow rate had a significant effect on foam behavior, enhancing foam displacement rate in both types of PVM.
机译:泡沫硬化疗法在临床上用于治疗静脉曲张。它涉及静脉内注射发泡表面活性剂,从而引起内皮壁损伤和血管萎缩,从而导致随后的新血管形成。临床上使用的泡沫生产方法包括手动技术,例如双注射器系统(DSS)和Tessari(TSS)方法。进行临床前体外研究以表征硬化剂的性能。但是,使用的实验模型通常不会复制生理相关的物理和生物学条件。在这项研究中,物理静脉模型(PVMs)被开发并首次用于表征硬质泡沫的流动行为。 PVM通过复制成型在聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)中制造,并被设计为模仿静脉的定性几何特征。根据不同的物理变量对泡沫行为进行了研究,即(i)静脉模型的几何形状(即生理静脉曲张与静脉曲张),(ii)泡沫产生技术以及(iii)血液替代物的流速。实验装置由位于倾斜平台上的PVM,控制血液替代品流速的注射泵和压力传感器组成。在施用泡沫时测量在PVM入口处的血液替代物的静压。分析记录的压力-时间曲线以量化泡沫行为的指标,特别关注泡沫膨胀和降解动力学。结果表明,与TSS泡沫相比,DSS和TSS泡沫在生理PVM中具有相似的膨胀率,而DSS泡沫在静脉曲张PVM中具有较低的膨胀率。在两种模型架构中,DSS泡沫的降解率均低于TSS泡沫。此外,背景流速对泡沫行为有显着影响,在两种类型的PVM中都提高了泡沫置换率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号