首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience >Prodromal Markers in Parkinson’s Disease: Limitations in Longitudinal Studies and Lessons Learned
【2h】

Prodromal Markers in Parkinson’s Disease: Limitations in Longitudinal Studies and Lessons Learned

机译:帕金森氏病的前驱标志物:纵向研究和经验教训的局限性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A growing body of evidence supports a prodromal neurodegenerative process preceding the clinical onset of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Studies have identified several different prodromal markers that may have the potential to predict the conversion from healthy to clinical PD but use considerably different approaches. We systematically reviewed 35 longitudinal studies reporting prodromal PD features and evaluated the methodological quality across 10 different predefined domains. We found limitations in the following domains: PD diagnosis (57% of studies), prodromal marker assessments (51%), temporal information on prodromal markers or PD diagnosis (34%), generalizability of results (17%), statistical methods (accounting for at least age as confounder; 17%), study design (14%), and sample size (9%). However, no limitations regarding drop-out (or bias investigation), or report of inclusion/exclusion criteria or prodromal marker associations were revealed. Lessons learned from these limitations and additional aspects of current prodromal marker studies in PD are discussed to provide a basis for the evaluation of findings and the improvement of future research in prodromal PD. The observed heterogeneity of studies, limitations and analyses might be addressed in future longitudinal studies using a, yet to be established, modular minimal set of assessments improving comparability of findings and enabling data sharing and combined analyses across studies.
机译:越来越多的证据支持帕金森氏病(PD)临床发作之前的前驱神经退行性过程。研究发现了几种不同的前驱标志物,它们可能具有预测从健康PD到临床PD的转化的潜力,但使用的方法大不相同。我们系统地回顾了35篇报道前驱性PD功能的纵向研究,并评估了10个不同预定义领域的方法学质量。我们发现以下领域存在局限性:PD诊断(研究的57%),前驱标志物评估(51%),前驱标志物或PD诊断的时间信息(34%),结果的可概括性(17%),统计方法(会计年龄至少为混杂因素; 17%),研究设计(14%)和样本量(9%)。但是,没有发现关于辍学(或偏倚调查),纳入/排除标准或前驱标志物关联的报告的限制。讨论了从这些局限性以及当前PD前驱标志物研究的其他方面吸取的经验教训,为评估结果和改进前驱PD的未来研究提供了基础。观察到的研究,局限性和分析的异质性可能会在将来的纵向研究中使用尚未建立的,模块化的最小评估集来解决,这些评估集可提高研究结果的可比性,并实现跨研究的数据共享和组合分析。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号