首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Journal for Medical Education >How Important is Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Teaching in the Medical Curriculum? An Empirical Approach towards Students Views
【2h】

How Important is Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Teaching in the Medical Curriculum? An Empirical Approach towards Students Views

机译:医学伦理学和医学历史在医学课程中有多重要?学生观点的实证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: It was investigated how students judge the teaching of medical ethics and the history of medicine at the start and during their studies, and the influence which subject-specific teaching of the history, theory and ethics of medicine (GTE) - or the lack thereof - has on the judgement of these subjects.>Methods: From a total of 533 students who were in their first and 5th semester of the Bochum Model curriculum (GTE teaching from the first semester onwards) or followed the traditional curriculum (GTE teaching in the 5th/6th semester), questionnaires were requested in the winter semester 2005/06 and in the summer semester 2006. They were asked both before and after the 1st and 5th (model curriculum) or 6th semester (traditional curriculum). We asked students to judge the importance of teaching medical ethics and the history of medicine, the significance of these subjects for physicians and about teachability and testability (Likert scale from -2 (do not agree at all) to +2 (agree completely)).>Results: 331 questionnaire pairs were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the students of the two curricula at the start of the 1st semester.The views on medical ethics and the history of medicine, in contrast, were significantly different at the start of undergraduate studies: The importance of medical ethics for the individual and the physician was considered very high but their teachability and testability were rated considerably worse. For the history of medicine, the results were exactly opposite. GTE teaching led to a more positive assessment of items previously ranked less favourably in both curricula. A lack of teaching led to a drop in the assessment of both subjects which had previously been rated well.>Conclusion: Consistent with the literature, our results support the hypothesis that the teaching of GTE has a positive impact on the views towards the history and ethics of medicine, with a lack of teaching having a negative impact. Therefore the teaching of GTE should already begin in the 1st semester. The teaching of GTE must take into account that even right at the start of their studies, students judge medical ethics and the history of medicine differently.
机译:>目标:调查了学生在开始和学习过程中如何判断医学伦理学和医学史,以及其对医学历史,理论和伦理学的影响(GTE)-或缺乏-取决于这些科目的判断。>方法:从该课程第一学期和第五学期的533名学生中Bochum模型课程(从上学期开始的GTE教学)或遵循传统课程(第5学期/ sup> / 6 学期的GTE教学),在冬季需要问卷调查2005/06学期和2006年夏季学期。他们分别在模型课程1 5或6sup 之前和之后被问及。 sup>学期(传统课程)。我们要求学生判断教授医学伦理学和医学史的重要性,这些学科对医生的重要性以及可教性和可测试性(Likert评分从-2(完全不同意)到+2(完全同意)) 。>结果:研究中包括331对问卷。在第一学期开始时,这两个课程的学生之间没有显着差异。相反,在本科生开始时,对医学伦理学和医学史的看法有显着差异研究:医学伦理学对个人和医生的重要性被认为很高,但他们的可教性和可测性却被认为差得多。就医学史而言,结果完全相反。 GTE教学对以前在这两个课程中排名都不理想的项目进行了更积极的评估。 >结论:与文献一致的是,我们的研究结果支持以下假设:GTE的教学对以下方面具有积极的影响:对医学历史和伦理学的看法,缺乏教学会产生负面影响。因此,GTE的教学应该已经在第一学期开始。 GTE的教学必须考虑到,即使在开始学习时,学生对医学伦理学和医学史的看法也会有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号