首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Services Research >Interorganizational exchanges as performance markers in a community cancer network.
【2h】

Interorganizational exchanges as performance markers in a community cancer network.

机译:组织间的交流是社区癌症网络中绩效的标志。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE. This study examines how "strategic partnerships" between community-based consortia of oncologists and hospitals (CCOPs) and clinical cooperative groups emerge, develop, and influence patient accruals (i.e., the number of patients enrolled in clinical trials) over time. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING. Study analyses are based on 65 pairwise relationships that 38 CCOPs established with eight clinical cooperative groups in September 1983 and maintained through February 1989. Data are drawn from grantee applications and progress reports. STUDY DESIGN. The study examines how different types of CCOP-cooperative group exchange relate to one another and to CCOP patient accruals over six time points. Key independent variables include resource dependence, information exchange (i.e., meeting attendance and committee membership), and protocol exchange (i.e., the number of different protocols used). DATA COLLECTION METHODS. Data extracted from secondary sources were entered in a data base. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS. The number of CCOP physicians and support staff who attend cooperative group meetings during the first two years of a clinical research partnership has a significant influence on meeting attendance and protocol use in later years. Two-thirds or more of the variance in patient accruals at each time point can be explained by the number of different protocols used and the number of CCOP representatives serving on cooperative group committees (or attending cooperative group meetings). CONCLUSIONS. The findings highlight the importance of historical relationships and anticipated resource dependence in shaping initial exchange patterns. They also suggest that strategic partnerships need to emphasize structures and processes that encourage early involvement in collaborative activities and that reward participants for maintaining high levels of interaction.
机译:目的。这项研究研究了随着时间的推移,社区的肿瘤科医生和医院联合会(CCOP)与临床合作组织之间的“战略伙伴关系”如何出现,发展和影响患者应计费用(即,参加临床试验的患者人数)。数据来源和研究设置。研究分析基于1983年9月与八个临床合作组织建立的38个CCOP并一直维持到1989年2月的65个成对关系。数据来自受资助者的申请和进度报告。学习规划。这项研究探讨了在六个时间点上,不同类型的CCOP合作组交换如何彼此关联以及CCOP患者应计费用。关键的独立变量包括资源依赖性,信息交换(即会议出席和委员会成员资格)和协议交换(即所使用的不同协议的数量)。数据收集方法。从二级来源提取的数据已输入数据库。主要发现。在临床研究合作伙伴关系的头两年中,参加合作小组会议的CCOP医师和支持人员的数量对以后几年的会议出席率和使用方案有重大影响。在每个时间点,应计患者人数差异的三分之二或更多可以由所使用的不同协议的数量以及在合作组委员会(或参加合作组会议)上服务的CCOP代表的数量来解释。结论。研究结果突出了历史关系和预期的资源依赖性在塑造初始交换模式中的重要性。他们还建议,战略伙伴关系需要强调鼓励早期参与协作活动并奖励参与者保持高度互动的结构和过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号