首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:多因素评估和针对性干预措施以防止社区和急诊场所中老年人跌倒和受伤:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of multifactorial assessment and intervention programmes to prevent falls and injuries among older adults recruited to trials in primary care, community, or emergency care settings.>Design Systematic review of randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials, and meta-analysis.>Data sources Six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Science Citation Index) to 22 March 2007, reference lists of included studies, and previous reviews.>Review methods Eligible studies were randomised or quasi-randomised trials that evaluated interventions to prevent falls that were based in emergency departments, primary care, or the community that assessed multiple risk factors for falling and provided or arranged for treatments to address these risk factors.>Data extraction Outcomes were number of fallers, fall related injuries, fall rate, death, admission to hospital, contacts with health services, move to institutional care, physical activity, and quality of life. Methodological quality assessment included allocation concealment, blinding, losses and exclusions, intention to treat analysis, and reliability of outcome measurement. >Results 19 studies, of variable methodological quality, were included. The combined risk ratio for the number of fallers during follow-up among 18 trials was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.02) and for fall related injuries (eight trials) was 0.90 (0.68 to 1.20). No differences were found in admissions to hospital, emergency department attendance, death, or move to institutional care. Subgroup analyses found no evidence of different effects between interventions in different locations, populations selected for high risk of falls or unselected, and multidisciplinary teams including a doctor, but interventions that actively provide treatments may be more effective than those that provide only knowledge and referral.>Conclusions Evidence that multifactorial fall prevention programmes in primary care, community, or emergency care settings are effective in reducing the number of fallers or fall related injuries is limited. Data were insufficient to assess fall and injury rates.
机译:>目的:评估通过多因素评估和干预计划来预防在初级保健,社区或急诊医疗机构中招募参加试验的成年人中跌倒和受伤的有效性。>设计系统评价>数据来源至2007年3月22日的六个电子数据库(Medline,Embase,CENTRAL,CINAHL,PsycINFO,社会科学引文索引),以下为参考文献列表: >审查方法符合条件的研究是随机或半随机试验,其评估的干预措施是基于急诊科,初级保健或评估多种风险因素的社区,以防止跌倒跌倒并提供或安排应对这些危险因素的治疗方法。>数据提取结果是跌倒者数量,跌倒相关伤害,跌倒率,死亡,残骸前往医院,与卫生服务机构联系,转向机构护理,体育锻炼和生活质量。方法学质量评估包括分配隐藏,盲目性,损失和排除,治疗意向分析以及结果测量的可靠性。 >结果包括19项方法学质量各异的研究。 18项试验中随访期间跌倒人数的综合风险比为0.91(95%置信区间0.82至1.02),跌倒相关伤害(八次试验)为0.90(0.68至1.20)。在入院,急诊就诊,死亡或转移到机构护理方面没有发现差异。亚组分析发现,没有证据表明在不同位置的干预措施,因跌倒高风险而选择的人群或未经选择的人群以及包括医生在内的多学科团队之间有不同的影响,但积极提供治疗的干预措施可能比仅提供知识和转诊的干预措施更为有效。 >结论的证据表明,在初级保健,社区或紧急护理环境中进行的多因素跌落预防计划可有效减少跌倒者或跌倒相关伤害的数量。数据不足以评估跌倒和受伤率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号