首页> 外文会议>International Ergonomics Association., Congress >Effectiveness of Interventions for Preventing Injuries in the Construction Industry: Results of an Updated Cochrane Systematic Review
【24h】

Effectiveness of Interventions for Preventing Injuries in the Construction Industry: Results of an Updated Cochrane Systematic Review

机译:干预措施防止建筑业伤害的有效性:更新的Cochrane系统审查结果

获取原文

摘要

Various interventions to prevent occupational injuries in the construction industry have been proposed and studied. This continuing updated Cochrane review systematically summarizes the most current scientific evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent injuries associated with construction work. Search terms that covered the concepts of 'construction workers', 'injury', 'safety' and 'study design' were used to identify intervention studies in five electronic databases up to April 2017. Acceptable study designs included randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled before-after studies (CBA) and interrupted time series (ITS). In total 17 studies, 14 ITS and three CBA studies, from the US (6), UK (2), Italy (3), Denmark (1), Finland (1), Austria (1) Germany (1) Spain (1), Belgium (1) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were at high risk of bias. There is very low-quality evidence that introducing regulations as such may or may not result in a decrease in fatal and non-fatal injuries. There is also very low-quality evidence that regionally oriented safety campaigns, training, inspections or the introduction of occupational health services may not reduce non-fatal injuries in construction companies. There is very low-quality evidence that company-oriented safety interventions such as a multifaceted safety campaign, a multifaceted drug workplace programme and subsidies for replacement of scaffoldings may reduce non-fatal injuries among construction workers.
机译:提出并研究了防止建筑业职业伤害的各种干预措施。这种持续更新的Cochrane审查系统地总结了最目前的科学证据,了解干预措施的有效性,以防止与建设工作有关的伤害。搜索条件涵盖了“建筑工人”,“伤害”,“安全”和“学习设计”的概念来识别五个电子数据库中的干预研究,该数据在2017年4月。可接受的研究设计包括随机对照试验(RCT),在研究之前进行,研究(CBA)和中断时间序列(其)。总共17项研究,14项和三项CBA研究,来自美国(6),英国(2),意大利(3),丹麦(1),芬兰(1),奥地利(1)德国(1)西班牙(1) ),比利时(1)达到纳入标准。大多数研究都有很高的偏见风险。有很低的质量证据表明该规定可能或可能不会导致致命和非致命损伤的降低。也有很低的证据表明,区域导向的安全运动,培训,检查或职业卫生服务的引入可能不会减少建筑公司的非致命伤害。有很多低质量的证据,即公司为导向的安全干预措施,如多方面的安全活动,多方面的药物工作场所计划和更换脚手架的补贴可能会降低建筑工人之间的非致命伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号