首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Multiple component interventions for preventing falls and fall-related injuries among older people: systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Multiple component interventions for preventing falls and fall-related injuries among older people: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:预防老年人跌倒和跌倒相关伤害的多因素干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Limited attention has been paid in the literature to multiple component fall prevention interventions that comprise two or more fixed combinations of fall prevention interventions that are not individually tailored following a risk assessment. The study objective was to determine the effect of multiple component interventions on fall rates, number of fallers and fall-related injuries among older people and to establish effect sizes of particular intervention combinations. Methods Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane, AMED, UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio, Current Controlled Trials register and Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials register were systematically searched to August 2013 for randomised controlled trials targeting those aged 60?years and older with any medical condition or in any setting that compared multiple component interventions with no intervention, placebo or usual clinical care on the outcomes reported falls, number that fall or fall-related injuries. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Estimates of fall rate ratio and risk ratio were pooled across studies using random effects meta-analysis. Data synthesis took place in 2013. Results Eighteen papers reporting 17 trials were included (5034 participants). There was a reduction in the number of people that fell (pooled risk ratio?=?0.85, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.80 to 0.91) and the fall rate (pooled rate ratio?=?0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.89) in favour of multiple component interventions when compared with controls. There was a small amount of statistical heterogeneity (I2?=?20%) across studies for fall rate and no heterogeneity across studies examining number of people that fell. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials found evidence that multiple component interventions that are not tailored to individually assessed risk factors are effective at reducing both the number of people that fall and the fall rate. This approach should be considered as a service delivery option.
机译:背景技术在文献中已经对多种预防跌倒的措施给予了有限的关注,这些措施包括两个或更多个固定的跌倒预防措施的固定组合,这些组合在风险评估后并未单独定制。研究目的是确定多因素干预对老年人的跌倒率,跌倒人数和跌倒相关伤害的影响,并确定特定干预措施组合的影响大小。方法截至2013年8月,系统搜索Medline,EMBASE,CINAHL,PsychInfo,Cochrane,AMED,英国临床研究网络研究组合,当前对照试验注册簿以及澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册簿,以针对60岁及以上年龄人群的随机对照试验。在任何医疗条件下或在将多成分干预与无干预,安慰剂或常规临床护理相比较的任何情况下,对报告的跌倒,跌倒次数或跌倒相关伤害的结局进行比较。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入的研究。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总研究的跌倒率和风险比的估计值。 2013年进行了数据综合。结果包括18篇报告17个试验的论文(5034名参与者)。跌倒的人数减少了(合并风险比率== 0.85,95%置信区间(95%CI)为0.80至0.91)和下降率(合并利率比率== 0.80,95%CI为0.72)至0.89),与对照组相比,支持多成分干预。在各个研究中,跌倒率的统计异质性很小(I 2 ?=?20%),而在研究跌倒人数的研究中,没有异质性。结论这项对随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析发现,有证据表明,并非针对单独评估的危险因素量身定制的多成分干预措施,在减少跌倒人数和跌倒率方面均有效。此方法应被视为服务提供选项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号