首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bentham Open Access >Does an Interdisciplinary Network Improve Dementia Care? Results from the IDemUck-Study
【2h】

Does an Interdisciplinary Network Improve Dementia Care? Results from the IDemUck-Study

机译:跨学科网络是否可以改善痴呆症护理? IDemUck研究的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Most persons with dementia live at home and are treated in the primary care. However, the ambulatory health care system in Germany contains a lot of “interface problems” and is not optimized for the future challenges. Innovative concepts like regional networks in dementia care exist on a project level and need to be tested for efficacy to encourage implementation. The goal of the study is the scientific evaluation of an already existing regional dementia network. Methods: Prospective randomized controlled trial of 235 community-living elderly with dementia and their family caregivers of network treatment (n=117) compared to usual care (n=118) in a predominantly rural region. The allocation to intervention or control group was based on network membership of their General Practitioner. Intervention patients received diagnostic evaluation and subsequent treatment according to network guidelines. Main outcome measures were the early contact with a neurologic or psychiatric specialist and dementia-specific medication as well as quality of life of the patients, and as secondary outcomes caregiver burden and caregiver health-related quality of life. Results: Network patients were more likely to receive antidementive drugs (50.5 % vs. 35.8 %; p=0.035) and had more often contact to a neurologist (18.6 % vs. 2.8 %; p<0.001). No group differences were found on patient’s quality of life nor overall effects or treatment by time effects. Intervention caregivers reported no significant improvements in health related quality of life measured by SF-36 and EQ-5D. Conclusion: The management of dementia patients in an interdisciplinary regional network solelyprovides measurable advantages with respect to the provision of dementia-specific medication and utilization of medical treatment i.e. referral rates to specialists. Further evaluation research is needed to identify relevant mechanismsof collaborative processes with respect to their impact on patient and caregiver related outcomes.
机译:背景:大多数痴呆症患者住在家里,在初级保健中接受治疗。但是,德国的门诊医疗系统包含许多“接口问题”,并且并未针对未来的挑战进行优化。痴呆症护理中的区域网络等创新概念存在于项目级别,需要对其功效进行测试以鼓励实施。该研究的目的是对已经存在的区域性痴呆网络进行科学评估。方法:在一个主要农村地区,对235名社区生活痴呆症及其网络护理家庭照护者(n = 117)与常规照护(n = 118)进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。干预组或对照组的分配基于其全科医生的网络成员资格。干预患者根据网络指南接受了诊断评估和后续治疗。主要结局指标是尽早与神经或精神科专家接触和痴呆症专用药物以及患者的生活质量,以及作为次要结局的照顾者负担和照顾者健康相关的生活质量。结果:网络患者更有可能接受抗痴呆药物治疗(50.5%vs. 35.8%; p = 0.035),并且接触神经科医师的频率更高(18.6%vs. 2.8%; p <0.001)。没有发现患者生活质量,总体效果或时间效果的治疗存在群体差异。干预护理人员报告说,用SF-36和EQ-5D测量的健康相关生活质量没有明显改善。结论:在跨学科区域网络中对痴呆患者的管理仅在提供痴呆特异性药物和药物利用即向专家转诊方面提供了可衡量的优势。需要进一步的评估研究来确定协作过程对患者和护理人员相关结局的影响的相关机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号