首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>APA Open Access >Differential Effects and Temporal Course of Attentional and Motivational Training on Excessive Drinking
【2h】

Differential Effects and Temporal Course of Attentional and Motivational Training on Excessive Drinking

机译:过度饮酒的注意和动机训练的差异作用和时间过程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two cognitive-motivational variables that help to solidify drinkers’ intentions to drink are their alcohol attentional bias and their maladaptive motivation. The Alcohol Attention Control Training Programme (AACTP) was designed to rectify the former, and the Life Enhancement and Advancement Programme (LEAP) was designed to rectify the latter. The present study used a factorial design to compare the individual and combined effects of the 2 interventions on mean weekly drinking and atypical weekly drinking of 148 harmful drinkers (49% males, mean age = 28.8 years). A variety of other cognitive-motivational and demographic measures were also taken at baseline, and the drinking measures were reassessed at posttreatment and 3 and 6 months later. In comparison with LEAP, the effects of AACTP were less enduring. Combining AACTP and LEAP had few incremental benefits. These results suggest that AACTP would be more effective for achieving short-term reductions in drinking, whereas LEAP would be more effective for alleviating problematic drinking.
机译:有助于巩固饮酒者饮酒意图的两个认知动机变量是他们的酒精注意偏见和适应不良的动机。酒精注意力控制培训计划(AACTP)旨在纠正前者,而生活改善与进步计划(LEAP)旨在纠正后者。本研究采用析因设计,比较了这两种干预措施对148名有害饮酒者(49%男性,平均年龄= 28.8岁)的平均每周饮酒量和非典型每周饮酒量的个体和综合影响。在基线时还采取了其他各种认知动机和人口统计学措施,并且在治疗后以及3和6个月后对饮酒措施进行了重新评估。与LEAP相比,AACTP的作用持久性较差。将AACTP和LEAP结合使用几乎没有增加的好处。这些结果表明,AACTP对于短期减少饮酒会更有效,而LEAP在缓解有问题的饮酒方面会更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号