首页> 中文期刊> 《天津法学》 >犯罪概念的司法运用

犯罪概念的司法运用

         

摘要

In the theory of Criminal Law of China the constitution of crime is the standard to measure whether the act constitutes a crime. Relying only on the judgment in the conformity of constitution of crime, it is diffi-cult for the judicature to deal with difficult cases in the vicinity of the critical point of the crime and non crime, neither to pass the gap between the criminal law text and the public simple feelings. The author tries to remove the estrangement between concept of crime and constitution of crime, social harmfulness and doctrine of a legally prescribed punishment for a special crime, restore criminal identification system under the leadership of concept of crime and with Qinhuohuo case and Wuying case as examples to prove the judicial practice char-acter of the criminal identification mode to benefit the criminal justice.%中国刑法理论通说认为,犯罪构成是衡量某一行为是否构成犯罪的圭臬,但是,仅凭犯罪构成符合性的判断,司法难以应对位于罪与非罪临界点附近的疑难案件,亦难以逾越刑法文本与民众朴素法感情之间的鸿沟.在消解犯罪概念与犯罪构成、社会危害性与罪刑法定原则之间的隔阂后,还原犯罪概念统领下"社会危害性、应受刑罚处罚性、刑事违法性"的逐层析罪模式,并用秦火火案与吴英案破解,例证此析罪模式的司法实践品格,以期对刑事司法有所裨益.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号