司空图著作权被质疑后《诗品》的价值和地位问题——以《〈二十四诗品〉诗歌美学》为中心进行讨论

摘要

关于<二十四诗品>是否为司空图所作,就现有材料看,否定的一方更有说服力.但伪托说对其价值和地位不会产生颠覆性影响,<二十四诗品>即使不是司空图作而系元人伪托,它也以其对中国诗歌美学精神和艺术风格的卓越阐释和系统归纳而在中国诗学史和美学史上占有突出地位,值得继续学习和深入研究.%There are controversial views on the author of Twenty-four Features of Poetry and at present the dominating view is that its author is not Sima Kong. However, whether its author is Sima Kong or not, Twenty-four Features of Poetry has much value and occupies an important position in the history of Chinese poetics and aesthetics due to its excellent interpretation of the aesthetic spirit and artistic style of Chinese poetry and deserves further studies.