首页> 中文期刊>山西省政法管理干部学院学报 >不当得利与侵占罪之界分

不当得利与侵占罪之界分

     

摘要

The author analyzes the mixed criminal and civil relationship between lost property and forgotten objects,and states that:those who refuse to hand over other people's forgotten objects should be punished for embezzlement;those who pick up but refuse to return other people's lost property should be identified as unjust enrichment.Embezzlement is a malicious unjust enrichment, which requires that the occupants should return the objects,while unjust enrichment is not subject to this limit. These cases should be identified correctly through legal principle and judicial practice.%文章分析了遗失物与遗忘物之间的刑民交错关系,指出拒不交出他人遗忘物的应当以侵占罪论处;拾得他人遗失物拒不返还的应是不当得利行为。侵占罪属于一种恶意的不当得利,要求占有人返还原物,而不当得利则不受此限。应从法理和司法实践上正确认定此类案件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号