善意取得与物权行为抽象性原则之民法价值判断评析

摘要

王轶先生在《民法价值判断问题的实体性论证规则——以中国民法学的学术实践为背景》一文中提出了两项实体性论证规则：没有足够充分且正当理由的情况下，应当坚持强式意义上的平等对待；在没有足够充分且正当理由的情况下，不得主张限制民事主体的自由。笔者就这两项实体性论证规则进行了分析和评判，并顺用这两项规则对善意取得制度和物权行为制度进行了实体性论证分析，从另一方面得出了不同于王轶先生的民法价值判断：物权抽象性原则优于善意取得制度。%In the article“Substantive Proof Rules of the Problem of Civil Law Value Judgments-in the Background of Academic Practice of Chinese Civil Law”, Mr. Wang Yi puts forward two substantive proof rules: without enough and proper reason we should adhere to strong-sense equal treatment; without enough and proper reason we should not be in favor of limiting the freedom of civil subject.The writer analyses and judges these two substantive proof rules, and carries out substantive proof analysis on bona fide acquisition and juristic act of real right. The civil law value judgment drawn in this paper, which is different from Mr.Wang’s, is that juristic act of real right is superior to bona fide acquisition.