《诗品》左思“虽浅于陆机，而深于潘岳”①考--兼释“深”“、浅”之美学内涵

摘要

The contradiction between moral integrity and vocable beauty was the principal contradiction in the development of poetry during the Jian’an years of Han Dynasty to the early Tang Dynasty. Zhong Rong judges poets,from beginning to end,with the standard of both moral integrity and vocable beauty,as shown in Cao Zhi’s poems,but in the actual Parnassus,it often can't be true. Zhong Rong’s judgment of some poets and their identified historical status are in difference,hence the judgment of Zuo Si“shallower than Lu Ji and deeper than Pan Yue”,but Zuo Si’s status in poetry history not as good as Panyue.“Deep”and“light”do not mean the advan-tages or disadvantages of former evaluations. The connotation of“deep”is dense in vocable beauty,with a slightly messy diffuse. The connotation of“shallow”is concise in vocable beauty and clean in writing,with a weakness of character.%骨气与词彩的矛盾是汉末建安至初唐时期诗坛发展的一对主要矛盾，而锺嵘自始至终都力求以曹植诗骨气与词彩兼备的美学标准品评诗人，然而诗坛的实际却往往无法兼美，锺嵘对某些诗人的具体品评与其诗歌史地位的认定也由此而产生分歧，遂导致了左思“虽浅于陆机，而深于潘岳”，但左思在《诗品》中的诗歌史地位却不如潘岳的结果。“深”、“浅”之评不代表品第之优劣，“深”之内涵为词彩繁密，略有芜漫之嫌；“浅”之内涵为词彩简省而行文洁净，有气骨柔弱之弊。