作者进一步回应了来自实践本体论的批评，论证了对象化本体论的合理性。第一，哲学既然要关怀现实而不是自说自话，作为本体的“一”就不应是纯“一”，而应是自我包含矛盾的“一”，而实践范畴却只在自身中显示矛盾的解决了的形式，消解了矛盾的本体性意义。第二，真正深刻地揭示矛盾，不能以现象学，只能以辩证法为主导原则，对象化范畴才更好地做到了这一点。第三，对象化本体论不以实践为自明前提，而将实践作为反思和批判的对象，这样才能真正将马克思主义的现实性、批判性落到实处。%The author responds a criticism from praxis ontology , and proves the rationality of objectifica-tion ontology.First, to care for reality, the One as noumenon should be the One containing contradiction , not the pure One .While the praxis as a category only displays the form of contradictions resolved so as to dissolve the ontological significance of contradiction .Second , it is dialectics , not phenomenology that can deeply indi-cate contradiction.Objectification as a category can accomplish it better than the category of praxis .At last, because objectification ontology takes praxis as an object of critics , not a self-evident premise , the realism and criticalness of Marxism can really come true .
展开▼
