有限责任公司股权质押内部限制合理性之辨析

摘要

The shareholders have the right to pledge the shares.Chinese Guarantee Law and Taiwan＇s Civil Law have the provisions,that share pledge applies the rule of share transfer.It is means that share pledge has to get the consent of other shareholders.This is within limits for share pledge.While Japanese Company regulates that the establishment of share pledge does not apply the rule of share transfer.It is necessary for implement of share pledge to get the consent of other shareholders.As the differences between share transfer and share pledge,within limits for share pledge made difficult to application of law.Japanese Company will solve this problem.%股东可以出质股权。我国大陆《担保法》及台湾地区《民法》规定股权质押适用股权转让的规则,需要经过其他股东的同意,在公司内部受到限制。日本公司法则规定股权质押设立时,不适用转让限制的规定,质权实行则需要公司同意。由于股权质押与股权转让的差异,使得内部限制的立法产生了诸多适用上的难点,而日本的区别质权设定和质权实现的立法则较好地解决了这些问题。